Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 62670/12 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95
FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 62670/12
(a) Did the courts carry out an analysis of whether or not the applicant's blog post sought to make a contribution to a debate on matters of general interest or public concern, and did they recognise that the proceedings in the present case involved a conflict between the right to freedom of expression and the protection of reputation (see Dyundin v. Russia, no. 37406/03, § 33, 14 October 2008, and Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-VIII)?. - EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 28525/95
UNABHÄNGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 62670/12
(e) Did the courts distinguish between the standard of proof required in criminal proceedings and that which ought to be observed when expressing someone's opinion on a matter of public concern (see Brosa v. Germany, no. 5709/09, § 48, 17 April 2014, and Unabhängige Initiative Informationsvielfalt v. Austria, no. 28525/95, § 46, ECHR 2002-I)?. - EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 37406/03
DYUNDIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 62670/12
(a) Did the courts carry out an analysis of whether or not the applicant's blog post sought to make a contribution to a debate on matters of general interest or public concern, and did they recognise that the proceedings in the present case involved a conflict between the right to freedom of expression and the protection of reputation (see Dyundin v. Russia, no. 37406/03, § 33, 14 October 2008, and Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 74, ECHR 2001-VIII)?.