Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 21328/93 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1993,25657) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JOHANSSON v. SWEDEN
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85
H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 21328/93
In its judgment (Series A no. 171), the Court found that questions of permits to acquire property as well as questions of compulsory sales concerned the individual's 'civil rights and obligations' and that the individual who was affected had a right under the Convention to have the issue examined by a court.She considers that the translation, which appears in the Court's judgment in the Håkansson and Sturesson case (Eur. Court H.R., judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171), is not quite exact, since the Swedish word "förhör", which appears in the original text, does not correspond to "hearing" but rather to "interrogation" or "questioning".
- EKMR, 30.11.1992 - 14006/88
JOHANSSON v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 21328/93
She has previously submitted complaints to the Commission which were registered as Application No. 14006/88.The Commission first notes in this respect that the question of whether or not the applicant should get a permit to retain the property had already been determined in previous proceedings which were the subject of Application No. 14006/88.
- EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 11760/85
ÉDITIONS PÉRISCOPE v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 21328/93
It is sufficient that the action was "pecuniary" in nature and that the action was founded on an alleged infringement of rights which were likewise pecuniary rights (Eur. Court H.R., Editions Périscope judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-B, p. 72, para. 40) or that the outcome of the proceedings would be "decisive for private rights and obligations" (Eur. Court H.R., X v. France judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, p. 90, para. 30). - EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 7984/77
PRETTO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 21328/93
1 (Art. 6-1) (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Pretto and Others judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71, p. 16, para. 37). - EGMR, 31.03.1992 - 18020/91
X c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 21328/93
It is sufficient that the action was "pecuniary" in nature and that the action was founded on an alleged infringement of rights which were likewise pecuniary rights (Eur. Court H.R., Editions Périscope judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-B, p. 72, para. 40) or that the outcome of the proceedings would be "decisive for private rights and obligations" (Eur. Court H.R., X v. France judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, p. 90, para. 30).