Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 10.09.1998 - 40477/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1998,33046) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MUSA v. AUSTRIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Art. 14 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EKMR, 10.09.1998 - 40477/98
It has no independent existence since it has effect solely in relation to "the enjoyment of the rights and freedoms" safeguarded by those provisions (Eur. Court HR, Marckx v. Belgium judgment o 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31; Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany judgment of 18 July 1994, p. 32, para. 22). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EKMR, 10.09.1998 - 40477/98
There must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aims sought to be realised'(see Eur. Court HR, Tre Traktörer Ab v. Sweden judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 159, p. 23, para. 59; see also James and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, pp. 29 and 34, paras. 37 and 50, and Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 26, para. 69). - EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80
VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 10.09.1998 - 40477/98
The Commission recalls that Article 14 safeguards individuals placed in analogous situations from discrimination (Eur. Court HR, Van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 22, para. 46). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10873/84
TRE TRAKTÖRER AKTIEBOLAG v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 10.09.1998 - 40477/98
There must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aims sought to be realised'(see Eur. Court HR, Tre Traktörer Ab v. Sweden judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 159, p. 23, para. 59; see also James and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, pp. 29 and 34, paras. 37 and 50, and Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 26, para. 69).