Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 18.10.1994 - 16898/90 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,24185) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 18.10.1994 - 16898/90
- EGMR, 18.02.1997 - 16898/90
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79
Öztürk ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1994 - 16898/90
They further point out that Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention is complied with if, in administrative "criminal" matters, a last instance decision is taken by an independent and impartial tribunal (Eur. Court H.R., Öztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73), and consider that the Administrative Court and the Constitutional Court together comply with the requirements of Article 6 (Art. 6). - EGMR, 29.04.1988 - 10328/83
BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1994 - 16898/90
It is true, as the Government submit, that it would have been open to the applicant in the light of the findings of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Belilos (judgment of 29 April 1988, Series A no. 132), to submit to the Constitutional Court that that Court's traditional reasoning as to the Austrian reservation to Article 5 (Art. 5) of the Convention should be re-considered. - EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 11034/84
WEBER c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1994 - 16898/90
The Commission notes that the case of Weber was decided by the European Court of Human Rights on 22 May 1990 (Series A no. 177), post-dating the Vienna Provincial Governor's decision of 21 April 1989 by over a year.