Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 18.10.1994 - 18696/91 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,28047) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1994 - 18696/91
The Commission also recalls that it is initially for the individual applicant to select which legal remedy to pursue (Eur. Court H.R., Airey judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, p. 12, para. 23). - EGMR, 24.10.1986 - 9118/80
AGOSI c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1994 - 18696/91
Where therefore there is a choice of remedies open to the applicant to redress an alleged violation of the Convention, Article 26 ((Art. 26) of the Convention must be applied to reflect the practical realities of the applicant's position in order to ensure the effective protection of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention (No. 9118/80, Dec. 9.3.1983, D.R. 32 p. 165). - EGMR, 04.12.1979 - 7710/76
Schiesser ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1994 - 18696/91
In this respect, the Commission recalls that "paragraph 1 (c) forms a whole with paragraph 3" and ""competent legal authority' is a synonym, of abbreviated form, for "judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power'" (Eur. Court H.R., Ireland v. the United Kingdom judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 75, para. 199; Schiesser judgment of 4 December 1980, Series A no. 34, p. 12, para. 29).