Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 28.02.1996 - 26663/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1996,23914) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TEE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88
NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1996 - 26663/95
Thus, an interference with the professional reputation of an individual may, in certain circumstances, fall to be examined under Article 8 (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Niemietz judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 33, para. 29; Appl. No. 17101/90, Dec. 15.5.92, unpublished; Appl. No. 23953/94, Dec. 6.9.95, D.R. 82, p. 51, 54). - EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90
FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1996 - 26663/95
Insofar as the applicant may be understood as claiming that Article 6 (Art. 6) was breached in the determination of his civil right to a good reputation, the Commission recalls the Convention organs' case-law according to which an investigation on factual matters in the United Kingdom, effected by inspectors acting under the Companies Act 1985, was found not to involve "determination" of a civil right to a good reputation (Eur. Court H.R., Fayed v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, para. 61). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 28.02.1996 - 26663/95
It only applies if the individual can be said to have an "arguable claim" of a violation of the Convention (Eur. Court H.R., Boyle and Rice judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, para. 52).