Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZBOROVSKÝ v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3-b - No significant disadvantage) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Constitutional proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Zborovský v. Slovakia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08
• EGMR, 30.04.2014 - 14325/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96

  CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  Accordingly, the Court does not award any sum under this head (see CumpÇ?nÇ? and MazÇ?re v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 133-134, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  In this way the right to a fair hearing embodies the "right to court", one aspect of which is the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18; Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 116, ECHR 2005-X).
• EGMR, 18.02.1999 - 26083/94

  WAITE AND KENNEDY v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  In other words, everyone has the right to have any claim relating to his civil rights and obligations brought before a court or tribunal (see, among many other authorities, Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 50, ECHR 1999-I).

 
• EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96

  ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  In this way the right to a fair hearing embodies the "right to court", one aspect of which is the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18; Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 116, ECHR 2005-X).
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 42527/98

  Enteignung eines Gemäldes in Tschechien auf Grund der Benes-Dekrete - …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  In this way the right to a fair hearing embodies the "right to court", one aspect of which is the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18; Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 43, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 116, ECHR 2005-X).
• EGMR, 26.10.1984 - 9186/80

  DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  The Court also reiterates that a restrictive interpretation of the right of access to court guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 would not be consonant with the object and purpose of the provision (see De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 30, Series A no. 86).
• EGMR, 01.07.2010 - 25551/05

  KOROLEV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  The Court therefore concludes that even assuming that the other criteria for rejecting the complaint under Article 35 § 3 (b) of the Convention are met, respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto requires its it examination on the merits (see, for example, Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010, and, a contrario, Adrian Mihai Ionescu v. Romania (dec.), no. 36659/04, § 39, 1 June 2010).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 12945/87

  HADJIANASTASSIOU v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  Moreover, parties to proceedings must be able to exercise usefully the rights of appeal or other remedy available to them (see Hadjianastassiou v. Greece, 16 December 1992, § 33, Series A no. 252; and Marpa Zeeland B.V. and Metal Welding B.V. v. the Netherlands, no. 46300/99, § 48, ECHR 2004-X).
• EGMR, 23.02.1999 - 41400/98

  MONFORTE SANCHO, GARCIA MORENO, ROIG ESPERT, ROIG ESPERT ET ICARDO GARCIA contre …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  38366/97, 38688/97, 40777/98, 40843/98, 41015/98, 41400/98, 41446/98, 41484/98, 41787/98 and 41509/98, §§ 33 and 37, ECHR 2000-I, and Zvolský and Zvolská, cited above, § 51).
• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 36659/04

  IONESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 14325/08

  The Court therefore concludes that even assuming that the other criteria for rejecting the complaint under Article 35 § 3 (b) of the Convention are met, respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto requires its it examination on the merits (see, for example, Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010, and, a contrario, Adrian Mihai Ionescu v. Romania (dec.), no. 36659/04, § 39, 1 June 2010).
• EGMR, 15.02.2000 - 38695/97

  GARCÍA MANIBARDO c. ESPAGNE