Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SAID BOTAN v. THE NETHERLANDS

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 1869/04
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 1869/04

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 16.09.1999 - 29569/95

  BUSCEMI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 1869/04

  Having regard to the fact, therefore, that the applicant has been granted a residence permit in the Netherlands, enabling her to exercise freely in that country her right to respect for her family life as protected by Article 8 of the Convention and interpreted in the Court's established case-law (see, mutatis mutandis, Boughanemi v. France, judgment of 24 April 1996, Reports 1996-II, pp. 607-08, § 35; C. v. Belgium, judgment of 7 August 1996, Reports 1996-III, pp. 922-23, § 25; Boujlifa v. France, judgment of 21 October 1997, Reports 1997-VI, p. 2263, § 36; and Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, § 53, ECHR 1999-VI), the Court considers that her complaint has been adequately and sufficiently remedied (see Sisojeva and Others, cited above, § 102).

• EGMR, 03.10.2014 - 12738/10

  JEUNESSE c. PAYS-BAS

  2.20 The appellant has cited the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the cases of Rodrigues da Silva [and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435/99, ECHR 2006-I], Said Botan [v. the Netherlands (striking out), no. 1869/04, 10 March 2009] and Ibrahim Mohamed [v. the Netherlands (striking out), no. 1872/04, 10 March 2009].