Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 04.07.1979 - 8414/78 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1979,3511) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
X. c. REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
X. v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (6)
- EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 25205/94
KREMERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
It is true that the applicant withdrew his earlier confessions before the trial courts, but, where a court is confronted with a contradiction between an earlier statement and subsequent evidence at the trial, it is the task of this court to consider the credibility of the various statements concerned (cf. No. 8414/78, Dec. 4.7.79, D.R. 17, p. 231). - EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 25207/94
KREMERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
It is true that the applicant withdrew his earlier confessions before the trial courts, but, where a court is confronted with a contradiction between an earlier statement and subsequent evidence at the trial, it is the task of this court to consider the credibility of the various declarations concerned (cf. No. 8414/78, Dec. 4.7.79, D.R. 17, p. 231). - EKMR, 06.04.1995 - 23931/94
BAKARE v. BELGIUM
Where a court is confronted with a contradiction between an earlier statement and subsequent evidence at the trial, it is the task of this court to consider the credibility of the declarations of the witness involved (cf. No. 8414/78, Dec. 4.7.79, D.R. 17 p. 231).
- EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 19769/92
J.H.S. v. THE NETHERLANDS
More in particular, where a court is confronted with a contradiction between an earlier statement and subsequent evidence at the trial, it is the task of this court to consider the credibility of the declarations of the witness involved (cf. No. 8414/78, Dec. 4.7.1979, D.R. 17 p. 231). - EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 21645/93
R.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
The Commission recalls that, where a court is confronted with a contradiction between an earlier statement and subsequent evidence at the trial, it is the task of this court to consider the credibility of the declarations involved (cf. No. 8414/78, Dec. 4.7.1979, D.R. 17 p. 231). - EKMR, 19.10.1995 - 25206/94
HOLS v. THE NETHERLANDS
It is true that the applicant withdrew his earlier confessions before the trial courts, but, where a court is confronted with a contradiction between an earlier statement and subsequent evidence at the trial, it is the task of this court to consider the credibility of the various declarations concerned (cf. No. 8414/78, Dec. 4.7.79, D.R. 17, p. 231).