Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.1999 - 37826/97

He submits that, after the date of introduction of the present application, it has become known that the Netherlands Government have failed to seek approval from the European Commission of the European Union of a large number of legal rules of a technical nature, as required according to the Securitel judgment of 30 April 1996 of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (No. C - 194/94).

He submits that, after the date of introduction of the present application, it has become known that the Netherlands Government have failed to seek approval from the European Commission of the European Union of a large number of legal rules of a technical nature, as required according to the Securitel judgment of 30 April 1996 of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (No. C - 194/94).

Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.1999 - 37826/97

b.) Insofar as the applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention of the working methods used in obtaining the samples at issue and their subsequent handling, the Court considers that questions relating to the admissibility, reliability and credibility of evidence in criminal proceedings are matters to be considered under Article 6 of the Convention as relating to fairness of criminal proceedings (cf. Eur. Court HR, Delta v. France judgment of 19 December 1990, Series A no. 190).

Auszug aus EGMR, 02.02.1999 - 37826/97

As regards the applicant's complaint that, in its judgment of 4 July 1995, the Court of Appeal failed to respond to certain arguments raised in his memorandum of oral pleading, the Court considers at the outset that the questions whether or not the arguments set out in the memorandum of oral pleading submitted by the defence were correctly included in the formal record of the hearing held on 23 June 1995 is not a matter which the Court, as such, can review under the terms of Article 19 of the Convention (cf. Eur. Court HR, Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, § 45).