Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALEKSANDRIJA A DOOEL v. NORTH MACEDONIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ALEKSANDRIJA A DOOEL v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 73049/01

  Budweiser-Streit

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 26635/12

  Although Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 does not guarantee a right to acquire property, in certain circumstances a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining an asset may also enjoy the protection of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, among many authorities, Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, §§ 64-65, ECHR 2007-I).
• EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87

  PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 26635/12

  The applicant company relied on the case of Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland (29 November 1991, Series A no. 222), arguing that it was similar to theirs.
• EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 62543/00

  GORRAIZ LIZARRAGA ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 26635/12

  In accordance with the Court's established case-law, the national authorities should exercise discretion in their choice and implementation of planning policies and in that context they enjoy a wide margin of appreciation (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-III; Lay Lay Company Limited v. Malta, no. 30633/11, § 83, 23 July 2013; and Crash 2000 OOD and others v. Bulgaria, (dec.), no. 49893/07, § 57, 17 December 2013).

 
• EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91

  PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 26635/12

  As regards the first issue, the Court reiterates that in accordance with its established case-law, "possessions" can be "existing possessions" or assets, including claims, in respect of which an applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (see, inter alia, Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others, cited above, § 51, and Pressos Companía Naviera S.A. v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, § 31, Series A no. 332).
• EGMR, 24.06.2003 - 44277/98

  STRETCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 26635/12

  The Court considers that the situation in the present case is different from those cases where it found that the applicants had had "legitimate expectations" based on a reasonably justified reliance on a legal document on the basis of which they had incurred financial obligations and which had subsequently been retrospectively invalidated to the applicants" detriment (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others, cited above, § 51, and Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no. 44277/98, §§ 33-35, 24 June 2003).
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 30633/11

  LAY LAY COMPANY LIMITED v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 26635/12

  In accordance with the Court's established case-law, the national authorities should exercise discretion in their choice and implementation of planning policies and in that context they enjoy a wide margin of appreciation (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-III; Lay Lay Company Limited v. Malta, no. 30633/11, § 83, 23 July 2013; and Crash 2000 OOD and others v. Bulgaria, (dec.), no. 49893/07, § 57, 17 December 2013).
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 49893/07

  CRASH 2000 OOD AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2019 - 26635/12

  In accordance with the Court's established case-law, the national authorities should exercise discretion in their choice and implementation of planning policies and in that context they enjoy a wide margin of appreciation (see Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-III; Lay Lay Company Limited v. Malta, no. 30633/11, § 83, 23 July 2013; and Crash 2000 OOD and others v. Bulgaria, (dec.), no. 49893/07, § 57, 17 December 2013).