Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 39814/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,27955) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AGRO FRIGO OOD v. BULGARIA
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
AGRO FRIGO OOD v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02
DRIZA c. ALBANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 39814/12
One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, inter alia, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII, and Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 63, ECHR 2007-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 24360/04
GIURAN v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 39814/12
A departure from that principle is justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-IX; Ro?Ÿca v. Moldova, no. 6267/02, § 25, 22 March 2005; Giuran v. Romania, no. 24360/04, § 30, ECHR 2011 (extracts)). - EGMR, 22.03.2005 - 6267/02
ROSCA v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2019 - 39814/12
A departure from that principle is justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character (see Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-IX; Ro?Ÿca v. Moldova, no. 6267/02, § 25, 22 March 2005; Giuran v. Romania, no. 24360/04, § 30, ECHR 2011 (extracts)).
- EGMR, 16.05.2023 - 23721/11
AYDIN AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE
The principle of res judicata requires that no party is entitled to seek a review of a final and binding judgment merely for the purpose of obtaining a rehearing and a fresh determination of the case (see, among others, Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-IX, and Agro Frigo OOD v. Bulgaria, no. 39814/12, § 35, 5 September 2019). - EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 53176/17
GRAZULEVICIUTE v. LITHUANIA
The relevant considerations to be taken into account in this connection include, in particular, the effect of the reopening and any subsequent proceedings on the applicant's individual situation (see, Agro Frigo OOD v. Bulgaria, no. 39814/12, § 35, 5 September 2019, and, mutatis mutandis, Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 62, 11 July 2017).