Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PIECHOTA v. POLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 40330/98
• EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 40330/98

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 40330/98

  Consequently, there is no justification for making any award to him under that head (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 164, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

  Obermeier ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 40330/98

  In this instance those circumstances call for a global assessment so that the Court does not consider it necessary to consider these questions in detail (see, among other authorities, the Obermeier v. Austria judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, pp. 23-24, § 72; the Ferraro v. Italy judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 197, pp. 9-10, § 17; Olstowski v. Poland, no. 34052/96, § 86, 15 November 2001, unreported; Parcinski v. Poland, no. 36250/97, § 49, 18 December 2001, unreported).

• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 49806/99

  PRODAN c. MOLDOVA

  On numerous occasions, and absolutely rightly, this Court has stated that applicants should prove the pecuniary damage for which they seek compensation and that they cannot be compensated for damage not actually suffered (see, among other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 162-165, ECHR 2000-XI; Treial v. Estonia, no. 48129/99, §§ 67-70, 2 December 2003; Lisiak v. Poland, no. 37443/97, § 52, 5 November 2002; Piechota v. Poland, no. 40330/98, § 49, 5 November 2002; Koral v. Poland, no. 52518/99, § 62, 5 November 2002; Nowicka v. Poland, no. 30218/96, § 82, 3 December 2002 and many, many others).