Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA (No. 3)

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• lto.de (Kurzinformation)

  Russland hat zu Nawalny nicht hinreichend ermittelt

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• StV 2023, 659 (Ls.)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

  MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 36418/20

  Article 2 also comes into play in situations where the person concerned was the victim of an activity or conduct, whether public or private, which by its nature put his or her life at real and imminent risk and he or she has suffered injuries that appear life-threatening as they occur, even though he or she ultimately survived (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI, and Tërshana v. Albania, no. 48756/14, § 132, 4 August 2020, with further references).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 36418/20

  As the Court's judgments are essentially declaratory, the respondent State remains generally free, subject to the supervision of the Committee of Ministers, to choose the means by which it will discharge its legal obligation under Article 46 of the Convention, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions set out in the Court's judgment (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 36418/20

  The State's obligation under Article 2 § 1 of the Convention to protect the right to life requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation when an individual has sustained life-threatening injuries in suspicious circumstances, even when the presumed perpetrator of the attack is not a State agent (see Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç, cited above, § 171, with further references; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012).

 
• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 43098/09

  McCAUGHEY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 36418/20

  However, in a number of exceptional cases, where the very nature of the violation found was such as to leave no real choice between measures capable of remedying it, the Court has indicated the necessary measures in its judgments (see, inter alia, McCaughey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 43098/09, § 144, ECHR 2013, and Nihayet Arici and Others v. Turkey, nos.
• EGMR, 04.08.2020 - 48756/14

  TËRSHANA v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 36418/20

  Article 2 also comes into play in situations where the person concerned was the victim of an activity or conduct, whether public or private, which by its nature put his or her life at real and imminent risk and he or she has suffered injuries that appear life-threatening as they occur, even though he or she ultimately survived (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-XI, and Tërshana v. Albania, no. 48756/14, § 132, 4 August 2020, with further references).
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 43606/04

  YOTOVA c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 36418/20

  The State's obligation under Article 2 § 1 of the Convention to protect the right to life requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation when an individual has sustained life-threatening injuries in suspicious circumstances, even when the presumed perpetrator of the attack is not a State agent (see Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç, cited above, § 171, with further references; Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; and Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012).
• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 24604/04

  NIHAYET ARICI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.06.2023 - 36418/20

  24604/04 and 16855/05, §§ 173-76, 23 October 2012).