Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAZIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention) (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Pressemitteilung)

  Arrêt Haziyev c. Azerbaïdjan - détention d'un journaliste réputé

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Pressemitteilung)

  Judgment Haziyev v. Azerbaijan - detention of award-winning journalist

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  HAZIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 16538/17

  Türkei wegen Haft für Journalisten verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  However, having regard to the conclusions reached above under Article 5 of the Convention, in the circumstances of the present case the Court does not consider it necessary to examine this complaint separately (see Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no. 13237/17, § 216, 20 March 2018, and Sahin Alpay v. Turkey, no. 16538/17, § 186, 20 March 2018).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 13237/17

  Türkei wegen Haft für Journalisten verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  However, having regard to the conclusions reached above under Article 5 of the Convention, in the circumstances of the present case the Court does not consider it necessary to examine this complaint separately (see Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no. 13237/17, § 216, 20 March 2018, and Sahin Alpay v. Turkey, no. 16538/17, § 186, 20 March 2018).
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 40984/07

  FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  As regards the part of the claim concerning the food and visit expenses, the Court does not find any causal link between the damage claimed and the violations found (see Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40984/07, § 186, 22 April 2010; Efendiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 27304/07, § 60, 18 December 2014; and Yagublu v. Azerbaijan, no. 31709/13, § 68, 5 November 2015).

 
• EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 69981/14

  RASUL JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  A detailed description of the relevant parts of the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court on the application of the provisions of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in the administration of justice, dated 30 March 2006, and on the application of the legislation by the courts during the consideration of applications for the preventive measure of remand in custody in respect of an accused, dated 3 November 2009, can be found in Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan (no. 69981/14, §§ 50-76 and §§ 79-80, 17 March 2016).
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 37138/06

  FARHAD ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  A detailed description of the relevant provisions of the CCrP concerning pre-trial detention and proceedings concerning the application and review of detention pending trial can be found in Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 37138/06, §§ 83-102, 9 November 2010), and Muradverdiyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 16966/06, §§ 35-49, 9 December 2010).
• EGMR, 25.06.2015 - 36229/11

  ISAYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  In those cases, the Court concluded that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, in that the applicants' detention had not been based on a court decision and had therefore been unlawful within the meaning of that provision (see, among other cases, Farhad Aliyev, cited above, §§ 174-179; Allahverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 49192/08, §§ 45-46, 6 March 2014; and Isayeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 36229/11, §§ 69-70, 25 June 2015).
• EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 49192/08

  ALLAHVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  In those cases, the Court concluded that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, in that the applicants' detention had not been based on a court decision and had therefore been unlawful within the meaning of that provision (see, among other cases, Farhad Aliyev, cited above, §§ 174-179; Allahverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 49192/08, §§ 45-46, 6 March 2014; and Isayeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 36229/11, §§ 69-70, 25 June 2015).
• EGMR, 09.12.2010 - 16966/06

  MURADVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  A detailed description of the relevant provisions of the CCrP concerning pre-trial detention and proceedings concerning the application and review of detention pending trial can be found in Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 37138/06, §§ 83-102, 9 November 2010), and Muradverdiyev v. Azerbaijan (no. 16966/06, §§ 35-49, 9 December 2010).
• EGMR, 18.12.2014 - 27304/07

  EFENDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  As regards the part of the claim concerning the food and visit expenses, the Court does not find any causal link between the damage claimed and the violations found (see Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40984/07, § 186, 22 April 2010; Efendiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 27304/07, § 60, 18 December 2014; and Yagublu v. Azerbaijan, no. 31709/13, § 68, 5 November 2015).
• EGMR, 05.11.2015 - 31709/13

  YAGUBLU v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 19842/15

  As regards the part of the claim concerning the food and visit expenses, the Court does not find any causal link between the damage claimed and the violations found (see Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40984/07, § 186, 22 April 2010; Efendiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 27304/07, § 60, 18 December 2014; and Yagublu v. Azerbaijan, no. 31709/13, § 68, 5 November 2015).

• EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 1459/14

  SADIGOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  As regards the applicant's claim in respect of pecuniary damage, the Court does not find any causal link between the damage claimed and the violation found (see Efendiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 27304/07, § 60, 18 December 2014; Yagublu v. Azerbaijan, no. 31709/13, § 68, 5 November 2015; and Haziyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 19842/15, § 49, 6 December 2018).
• EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 6180/15

  AYYUBZADE v. AZERBAIJAN

  Having regard to the submissions of the parties and the Court's findings under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention regarding the general context surrounding the case (see in particular paragraphs 53-54 above), the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the present complaint (compare Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Haziyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 19842/15, § 44, 6 December 2018; and Atilla Tas v. Turkey, no. 72/17, § 196, 19 January 2021).