Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YAGIZ v. TURKEY

  Art. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Preliminary objection allowed (ratione temporis) Not necessary to examine preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YAGIZ c. TURQUIE

  Art. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
  Exception préliminaire retenue (ratione temporis) Non-lieu à examiner l'exception préliminaire (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 11.10.1993 - 19092/91
• EGMR, 07.08.1996 - 19092/91

Wird zitiert von ... (15)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 23.03.1995 - 15318/89

  LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE (EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 07.08.1996 - 19092/91

  The very terms of the declaration made under Article 46 of the Convention (art. 46) preclude all argument: "This Declaration... is valid for a period of three years as from the date of its deposit and extends to matters raised in respect of facts, including judgments which are based on such facts which have occurred subsequent to the date of deposit of the present Declaration" (see paragraph 20 above; the Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections) judgment of 23 March 1995, Series A no. 310, p. 33, para.

• EKMR, 14.10.1996 - 25657/94

  AVSAR v. TURKEY

  The Commission finds also that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any legal remedy separate to the proceedings before the Criminal Court of Diyarbakir (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R. 75, p. 207).
• EKMR, 28.11.1995 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU v. TURKEY

  The Commission considers that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any other legal remedy in addition to the pending investigation by the Public Prosecutor of the Diyarbakir State Security Court (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R. 75).
• EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 22492/93

  KILIÇ v. TURKEY

  The Commission also considers that in the circumstances of this case the applicant was not required to pursue any legal remedy in addition to the public prosecutor's inquiry (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, to be published in D.R.75).

 
• EKMR, 05.03.1996 - 26129/95

  TANLI v. TURKEY

  The Commission finds that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any other legal remedy in addition to the criminal proceedings before the Airi Assize Court (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yaiiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R.75 p. 207).
• EKMR, 25.11.1996 - 27244/95

  TEPE v. TURKEY

  The Commission considers that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any legal remedy separate from the investigation commenced by the public prosecutor (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R. 75, p. 207).
• EKMR, 05.03.1996 - 25354/94

  SEN v. TURKEY

  The Commission finds that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any other legal remedy in addition to the public prosecutor's inquiry (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R. 75, p. 207).
• EKMR, 26.02.1996 - 25754/94

  HARAN v. TURKEY

  The Commission finds that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any other legal remedy in addition to the public prosecutor's inquiry (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R. 75, p. 207).
• EKMR, 03.04.1995 - 22495/93

  YASA v. TURKEY

  The Commission further considers that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any other legal remedy in addition to the public prosecutor's inquiry (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R. 75).
• EKMR, 15.05.1995 - 22880/93

  AYTEKIN v. TURKEY

  The Commission finds therefore that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any legal remedy separate to the investigation commenced by the public prosecutor and referred to the military authorities (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R. 75).
• EKMR, 20.02.1995 - 22496/93

  TEKIN v. TURKEY

  The Commission further considers that in the circumstances of this case the applicant is not required to pursue any other legal remedy in addition to the public prosecutor's inquiry (see eg. No. 19092/91, Yagiz v. Turkey, Dec. 11.10.93, D.R. 75).
• EKMR, 09.01.1995 - 22535/93

  KAYA v. TURKEY
• EKMR, 21.05.1998 - 33745/96

  SCARTH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EKMR, 03.04.1995 - 22676/93

  GÜL v. TURKEY
• EKMR, 20.02.1995 - 22491/93

  Ö.A. v. TURKEY
• EKMR, 20.02.1995 - 22729/93

  KAYA v. TURKEY