Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 37222/04 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALTINAY c. TURQUIE
Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 2, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2 MRK
Non-violation de l'article 14+P1-2 - Interdiction de la discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (article 2 du Protocole n° 1 - Droit à l'instruction-général) Violation de l'article 14+P1-2 - Interdiction de la discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALTINAY v. TURKEY
Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 2, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2 MRK
No violation of Article 14+P1-2 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-general) Violation of Article 14+P1-2 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 2 of ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALTINAY v. TURKEY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
[DEU] No violation of Article 14+P1-2 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-general);Violation of Article 14+P1-2 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 2 of ...
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Altinay v. Turkey
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[FRE]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 37222/04
- EGMR, 10.03.2017 - 37222/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 44774/98
LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 37222/04
As to the argument to the effect that Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 is inapplicable to a complaint relating exclusively to regulations on access to university, the Court reiterates its findings in previous judgments (see Leyla Sahin v. Turkey ([GC], no. 44774/98, §§ 134-142, ECHR 2005-XI, and Mürsel Eren v. Turkey, no. 60856/00, §§ 40-41, ECHR 2006-II) to the effect that access to any institution of higher education at any given time is an inherent part of the right set out in the first sentence of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1. Therefore, the subject of the complaint falls within the scope of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. - EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06
SEJDIC ET FINCI c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 37222/04
The Court reiterates that discrimination consists in treating differently, without any objective and reasonable justification, persons in reasonably similar situations, and that a difference in treatment is devoid of any "objective and reasonable justification" if it does not pursue a "legitimate aim" or if there is no "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved" (see, among many other authorities, Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 42, ECHR 2009, and Ali v. United Kingdom, no. 40385/06, § 53, 11 January 2011). - EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00
Andrejeva ./. Lettland
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 37222/04
The Court also reiterates that the scope of the margin of appreciation enjoyed by the Contracting Parties in this context varies according to circumstances, the subject-matter and the background (see Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 82, ECHR 2009). - EGMR, 07.02.2006 - 60856/00
MÜRSEL EREN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 37222/04
As to the argument to the effect that Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 is inapplicable to a complaint relating exclusively to regulations on access to university, the Court reiterates its findings in previous judgments (see Leyla Sahin v. Turkey ([GC], no. 44774/98, §§ 134-142, ECHR 2005-XI, and Mürsel Eren v. Turkey, no. 60856/00, §§ 40-41, ECHR 2006-II) to the effect that access to any institution of higher education at any given time is an inherent part of the right set out in the first sentence of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1. Therefore, the subject of the complaint falls within the scope of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. - EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 40385/06
ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 37222/04
The Court reiterates that discrimination consists in treating differently, without any objective and reasonable justification, persons in reasonably similar situations, and that a difference in treatment is devoid of any "objective and reasonable justification" if it does not pursue a "legitimate aim" or if there is no "reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved" (see, among many other authorities, Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 42, ECHR 2009, and Ali v. United Kingdom, no. 40385/06, § 53, 11 January 2011).