Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 53241/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16338) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MEREUTA v. ROMANIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90
KEEGAN v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 53241/09
It makes reference to the basic principles established in such cases (see, among many other authorities, Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, 5 April 2005; Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290; Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, ECHR 2000-I; Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A; and Nistor v. Romania, no. 14565/05, 2 November 2010). - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 53241/09
It makes reference to the basic principles established in such cases (see, among many other authorities, Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, 5 April 2005; Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290; Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, ECHR 2000-I; Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A; and Nistor v. Romania, no. 14565/05, 2 November 2010). - EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 14565/05
NISTOR c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 53241/09
It makes reference to the basic principles established in such cases (see, among many other authorities, Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, 5 April 2005; Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290; Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, ECHR 2000-I; Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A; and Nistor v. Romania, no. 14565/05, 2 November 2010). - EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 18830/07
PLAZA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 53241/09
In particular, it reiterates that in matters relating to their custody, the interests of children are of paramount importance and that the child's best interests must be the primary consideration (see, to that effect, Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 134, 6 July 2010, and Plaza v. Poland, no. 18830/07, § 71, 25 January 2011) and may, depending on their nature and seriousness, override those of the parents (see Sahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943/96, § 66, ECHR 2003-VIII).