Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  N.F. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  N.F. v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications

  Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR - 27062/15 (anhängig)

  A.G. v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  27062/15.

  27062/15.

• KAG Mainz, 30.10.2008 - M 26/08

  Eingruppierung Kirchenmusiker

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  26/08/2014, Pskov Regional Court.
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 04.04.2003 - 19/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  19/02/2016, Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

 
• EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 45245/15

  GAUGHRAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  In its assessment of the proportionality of the interference in those cases the Court has had regard to the following elements: the nature and gravity of the offences in question; the level of the actual interference with the right to respect for private life; the scope and application of the data storage system; the data retention period; the possibility of review; safeguards against abuse; and guarantees aimed at regulating access by third parties and protecting data integrity and confidentiality (see, for instance, S. and Marper, cited above, §§ 118-24; Gardel, cited above, §§ 65-70; and Gaughran v. the United Kingdom, no. 45245/15, §§ 94 and 96, 13 February 2020, with further references).
• RG, 18.04.1903 - I 30/03

  Nachverfahren.; Zwangsvollstreckung.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  30/03/2016.
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  The law must be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 103, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 11.06.2020 - 74440/17

  P.N. v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  The domestic law must therefore afford appropriate safeguards to prevent any such use of personal data as may be inconsistent with the guarantees of this Article (see P.N. v. Germany, no. 74440/17, § 70, 11 June 2020, and S. and Marper, cited above, § 103).
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 16428/05

  GARDEL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  In the light of the Court's case-law in respect of Article 8 of the Convention, it follows that in the instant case, data which were processed by the Ministry (and which related to discontinued criminal proceedings and criminal convictions that have become spent or have been lifted by a court) concerned the applicants' private life and therefore attracted the protection of Article 8 of the Convention (see also Gardel v. France, no. 16428/05, § 58, ECHR 2009, and Brunet v. France, no. 21010/10, § 31, 18 September 2014).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  The law must be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 103, ECHR 2008).
• EGMR, 24.01.2023 - 17912/15

  KUTAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 3537/15

  the decision of the President of the Section to appoint one of the elected judges of the Court to sit as an ad hoc judge, applying by analogy Rule 29 § 2 of the Rules of Court (see, Kutayev v. Russia, no. 17912/15, §§ 5-8, 24 January 2023);.
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 5335/06

  B.B. c. FRANCE

• EGMR, 16.04.2024 - 40519/15

  BORISLAV TONCHEV v. BULGARIA

  Merits Existence of an interference 124. It is settled that (a) the processing of data about criminal convictions and related measures concerns the private life of the people to whom those data relate, and thus attracts the protection of Article 8 of the Convention, and (b) the processing of such data by the authorities amounts to interference with the data subjects' right to respect for their private life (see, as a recent authority, N.F. and Others v. Russia, nos. 3537/15 and 8 others, §§ 34 and 38, 12 September 2023).

  In conclusion, a key underlying question that can be discerned in the present case and others recently decided by the Court (see, for example, N.F. and Others v. Russia, no. 3537/15 and 8 others, 12 September 2023) is the following: does Article 8 of the Convention encompass a right to rehabilitation for criminal offenders who have paid their debt to society, in connection with core aspects of their private lives, such as employment and other drivers of social reintegration? And if so, what are the contours of such a right? While the Court's case-law, as it currently stands, provides some partial answers in this regard, it has yet to deal head-on with this important set of questions.

• EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 33696/19

  PODCHASOV v. RUSSIA

  3537/15 and 8 others, § 30, 12 September 2023).
• EGMR - 20039/22 (anhängig)

  ACAR v. TÜRKIYE

  3537/15 and 8 others, § 38, 12 September 2023, with further references)?.