Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 61978/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,14781) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KAZANTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99
PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 61978/08
While not every investigation should necessarily come to a conclusion which coincides with a claimant's account of events, any investigation should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III, and Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93
MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 61978/08
While not every investigation should necessarily come to a conclusion which coincides with a claimant's account of events, any investigation should in principle be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III, and Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II). - EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06
PRIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 61978/08
An individual does not cease to enjoy the right to peaceful assembly as a result of sporadic violence or other punishable acts committed by others in the course of the demonstration, if the individual in question remains peaceful in his or her own intentions or behaviour (see Ezelin, cited above, § 53; Ziliberberg v. Moldova (dec.), no. 61821/00, 4 May 2004; and Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 155, 12 June 2014). - EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 74552/01
OYA ATAMAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 61978/08
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding the right to freedom of peaceful assembly (see Kudrevicius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and the principles concerning the proportionality of interference with that right (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). - EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 33482/06
HYDE PARK AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 61978/08
The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding the right to freedom of peaceful assembly (see Kudrevicius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and the principles concerning the proportionality of interference with that right (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).