Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PRIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) No violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) Non-pecuniary damage - ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Primov and Others v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (23)Neu Zitiert selbst (14)

• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  As to whether or not the amounts were "actually incurred", the Court reiterates that even where legal fees have not been paid, they remain "recoverable" under the domestic law (see Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 147, ECHR 2005-IV).
• EGMR, 02.10.2001 - 29221/95

  STANKOV AND THE UNITED MACEDONIAN ORGANISATION ILINDEN v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  The Court reiterates that the link between Article 10 and Article 11 is particularly relevant where the authorities have interfered with the right to freedom of peaceful assembly in reaction to the views held or statements made by participants in a demonstration or members of an association (see, for example, Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, § 85, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 25390/94

  REKVÉNYI c. HONGRIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  Some laws are inevitably couched in terms which, to a greater or lesser extent, are vague (see, among other authorities, Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-III).

 
• EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 29032/95

  FELDEK c. SLOVAQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  The Court reiterates that it has been its constant approach, under Article 10, to require very strong reasons for justifying restrictions on political speech or serious matters of public interest (see, with necessary changes made, Karman v. Russia, no. 29372/02, § 36, 14 December 2006; Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 83, ECHR 2001-VIII; and Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 25691/04

  BUKTA ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  In particular, where irregular demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence the Court has required that the public authorities show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings (see Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202/06, § 38, 10 July 2012; Galstyan, cited above, §§ 116-117; Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 37, ECHR 2007-III; Oya Ataman, cited above, §§ 38-42; and Akgöl and Göl v. Turkey, nos. 28495/06 and 28516/06, § 43, 17 May 2011).
• EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97

  Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  Although the reasonableness of the length of the detention cannot be defined in abstracto, and whereas even short periods of detention are susceptible to review by the Court (see Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, § 66, ECHR 2003-I (extracts), and Å¢urcan v. Moldova, no. 39835/05, §§ 45 et seq., 23 October 2007), the Court observes that in casu the applicants" detention was mainly justified by the gravity of the charges against them; the three detention orders were equally laconic and did not rely on other facts specific to the situation of each applicant (except for a very general reference to the "personality" of the first applicant).
• EGMR, 31.03.2009 - 33482/06

  HYDE PARK AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  The Court reiterates that the term "restrictions" in paragraph 2 of Article 11 must be interpreted as including measures taken before or during the public assembly - such as banning the event, dispersal of the gathering or the arrest of participants - and those, such as punitive measures, taken after the meeting (see Ezelin, cited above, § 39; Baczkowski and Others v. Poland, no. 1543/06, §§ 66-68, 3 May 2007; Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 7 and 30, ECHR 2006-XIII; Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, §§ 9, 13, 16, 41, 44 and 48, 31 March 2009; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 10877/04

  SERGEY KUZNETSOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  The Court reiterates that the term "restrictions" in paragraph 2 of Article 11 must be interpreted as including measures taken before or during the public assembly - such as banning the event, dispersal of the gathering or the arrest of participants - and those, such as punitive measures, taken after the meeting (see Ezelin, cited above, § 39; Baczkowski and Others v. Poland, no. 1543/06, §§ 66-68, 3 May 2007; Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 7 and 30, ECHR 2006-XIII; Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, §§ 9, 13, 16, 41, 44 and 48, 31 March 2009; Osmani and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; and Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 36, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 34202/06

  BERLADIR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  In particular, where irregular demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence the Court has required that the public authorities show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings (see Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202/06, § 38, 10 July 2012; Galstyan, cited above, §§ 116-117; Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 37, ECHR 2007-III; Oya Ataman, cited above, §§ 38-42; and Akgöl and Göl v. Turkey, nos. 28495/06 and 28516/06, § 43, 17 May 2011).
• EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 28495/06

  AKGÖL AND GOL v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 17391/06

  In particular, where irregular demonstrators do not engage in acts of violence the Court has required that the public authorities show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful gatherings (see Berladir and Others v. Russia, no. 34202/06, § 38, 10 July 2012; Galstyan, cited above, §§ 116-117; Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 37, ECHR 2007-III; Oya Ataman, cited above, §§ 38-42; and Akgöl and Göl v. Turkey, nos. 28495/06 and 28516/06, § 43, 17 May 2011).
• EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 29372/02

  KARMAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 38726/05

  PELEVIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 16999/04

  SAMÜT KARABULUT v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 39835/05

  TURCAN AND TURCAN v. MOLDOVA

• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 37553/05

  KUDREVICIUS ET AUTRES c. LITUANIE

  The Court therefore finds that the applicants" complaint should be examined under Article 11 alone (see Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080/08 and 8577/08, § 101, ECHR 2011-VI (extracts); see also, mutatis mutandis, Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, §§ 95-96, 15 November 2007; and Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 91, 12 June 2014).
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 74568/12

  Russland verurteilt: 25.000 Euro wegen Festnahme nach Demo

  In any event, an individual does not cease to enjoy the right to peaceful assembly as a result of sporadic violence or other punishable acts committed by others in the course of the demonstration, if the individual in question remains peaceful in his or her own intentions or behaviour (see Ezelin, cited above, § 53; Ziliberberg v. Moldova (dec.), no. 61821/00, 4 May 2004; and Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 155, 12 June 2014).
• LG Freiburg, 08.12.2023 - 64/23 NBs 450 Js 23772/22

  Notwendigkeit der Einzelfallprüfung und Prüfungsmaßstab bei Blockadeaktionen

  Ihre Durchsetzung kann aber nicht Selbstzweck sein (s. EGMR, Urt. v. 12.6.2014 - 17391/06 Rn. 118 - Primov ua ./. Russland).

 
• EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 27585/13

  UNITED CIVIL AVIATION TRADE UNION AND CSORBA v. HUNGARY

  In this connection, the Court reiterates that since overcrowding during a public event is fraught with danger, it is not uncommon for State authorities in various countries to impose restrictions on the location, date, time, form or manner of conduct of a planned public gathering (see Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 130, 12 June 2014).

  Since overcrowding during a public event is fraught with danger, it is not uncommon for State authorities to impose restrictions on the location, date, time, form or manner of conduct of a planned public gathering (see Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 130, 12 June 2014).

• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 57818/09

  LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court therefore finds that the applicants" complaint should be examined under Article 11, taken alone and in conjunction with Article 14 (see Schwabe and M.G. v. Germany, nos. 8080/08 and 8577/08, § 101, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Galstyan v. Armenia, no. 26986/03, §§ 95-96, 15 November 2007; and Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 91, 12 June 2014).
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 2653/13

  YAROSLAV BELOUSOV v. RUSSIA

  In other cases it found that the authorities" response to violence had been proportionate and complied with Article 11 of the Convention (see Osmani and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no. 50841/99, ECHR 2001-X; Protopapa v. Turkey, no. 16084/90, §§ 104-12, 24 February 2009; and Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, §§ 156-63, 12 June 2014).
• EGMR, 07.05.2019 - 75147/17

  Katalonien-Streit: Puigdemonts Grundrechte wurden nicht verletzt

  La Cour reconnaît par ailleurs que, en matière de débat politique, les garanties offertes par les articles 10 et 11 sont souvent complémentaires (Primov et autres c. Russie, no 17391/06, § 91, 12 juin 2014).
• EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 56896/17

  LAURIJSEN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  It notes that where both sides - demonstrators and police - were involved in violent acts, it is sometimes necessary to examine who started the violence (see Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 157, 12 June 2014).
• EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 48694/10

  ÇIÇEK ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE

  Elle note que lorsque les deux camps - manifestants et policiers - ont pris part à des actes violents, il est parfois nécessaire de rechercher qui a commis les premières violences et si le requérant lui-même figurait parmi les responsables des premiers heurts ayant contribué à la détérioration du caractère initialement pacifique du rassemblement (Primov et autres c. Russie, no 17391/06, § 157, 12 juin 2014).
• EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 29356/19

  PLESHKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court reiterates that since overcrowding during a public event is fraught with danger, it is not uncommon for State authorities in various countries to impose restrictions on the location, date, time, form or manner of conduct of a planned public gathering (see Primov and Others v. Russia, no. 17391/06, § 130, 12 June 2014).
• EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 23158/20

  MAKARASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 03.05.2022 - 18079/15

  BUMBES v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 20347/07

  EGITIM VE BILIM EMEKÇILERI SENDIKASI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 35880/14

  ZAKHAROV AND VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 10443/12

  GEYLANI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE
• EGMR, 05.05.2020 - 71314/13

  CSISZER ET CSIBI c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 14.01.2020 - 76061/14

  VAROGLU ATIK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 17804/09

  BARSEGHYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 42878/05

  SOLARI c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 53343/19

  KAYUMOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 01.03.2022 - 2064/10

  FEDOTOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.01.2022 - 22665/10

  PASHINYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 16.06.2020 - 61978/08

  KAZANTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA