Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YURIY SLYUSAR v. UKRAINE

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 39797/05

  However, it should, in principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 71, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 39797/05

  More specifically, where death occurs under suspicious circumstances, leaving room for allegations to be made of the intentional taking of life, the State must ensure some form of effective official investigation (see Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; Silih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, §§ 156-57, 9 April 2009; Girard v. France, no. 22590/04, § 76, 30 June 2011; and Shafiyeva v. Russia, no. 49379/09, §§ 86-96, 3 May 2012).
• EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 49379/09

  SHAFIYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 39797/05

  More specifically, where death occurs under suspicious circumstances, leaving room for allegations to be made of the intentional taking of life, the State must ensure some form of effective official investigation (see Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V; Silih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, §§ 156-57, 9 April 2009; Girard v. France, no. 22590/04, § 76, 30 June 2011; and Shafiyeva v. Russia, no. 49379/09, §§ 86-96, 3 May 2012).

• EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 44244/19

  KENTESH AND BORODYNYA v. UKRAINE

  39797/05, §§ 86-87,.

  §§ 76-80, 25 November 2010; Yuriy Slyusar v. Ukraine, no. 39797/05,.

• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 17860/17

  GOLOBORODKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  Failure to check different versions of events (Yuriy Slyusar v. Ukraine, no. 39797/05, §§ 86- 87, 17 January 2013);.

  no genuine attempt by the investigating authorities to carry out a thorough investigation (Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726/01, §§ 76-80, 25 November 2010; Yuriy Slyusar v. Ukraine, no. 39797/05,§§ 84-88, 17 January 2013);.

• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 13094/19

  BOGUTA AND TERESHCHENKO v. UKRAINE

  no genuine attempt by the investigating authorities to carry out a thorough investigation (Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726/01, §§ 76-80, 25 November 2010; Yuriy Slyusar v. Ukraine, no. 39797/05, §§ 84-88, 17 January 2013),.

  no genuine attempt by the investigating authorities to carry out a thorough investigation (Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726/01, §§ 76-80, 25 November 2010; Yuriy Slyusar v. Ukraine, no. 39797/05, §§ 84-88, 17 January 2013),.

 
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 3648/04

  CAVIT TINARLIOGLU c. TURQUIE

  Dans ce contexte également une exigence de promptitude et de diligence raisonnable est implicite (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Yuriy Slyusar c. Ukraine, no 39797/05, § 82, 17 janvier 2013, et Dâmbean c. Roumanie, no 42009/04, § 42, 23 juillet 2013).
• EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 12552/09

  SHIYANOV v. UKRAINE

  Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the people responsible will risk falling foul of the standard (see, for example, Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V, and Yuriy Slyusar v. Ukraine, no. 39797/05, §§ 76-78 and 82, 17 January 2013, with further references).
• EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 40814/20

  ABDELHADI ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  La Cour juge de manière constante qu'une telle enquête doit également être mise en ?“uvre lorsqu'une personne a disparu dans des circonstances permettant de considérer que sa vie était en danger (voir parmi beaucoup d'autres Chypre c. Turquie [GC], no 25781/94, § 132, CEDH 2001-IV, et Varnava et autres c. Turquie [GC], nos 16064/90 et 8 autres, § 191, CEDH 2009), et ce y compris lorsque cette disparition n'est pas imputable à un agent de l'Etat (Tahsin Acar c. Turquie [GC], no 26307/95, § 226, CEDH 2004-III, Girard c. France, no 22590/04, §§ 67 et 76-81, 30 juin 2011, et Yuriy Slyusar c. Ukraine, no 39797/05, §§ 76 et s., 17 janvier 2013).
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 68748/17

  YEFIMOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

  no genuine attempt by the investigating authorities to carry out a thorough investigation (Lyubov Efimenko v. Ukraine, no. 75726/01, §§ 76-80, 25 November 2010; Yuriy Slyusar v. Ukraine, no. 39797/05, §§ 84-88, 17 January 2013).
• EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 78587/12

  PREDA c. ROUMANIE

  Une exigence de promptitude et de diligence raisonnable est implicite dans ce contexte (Gina Ionescu c. Roumanie, no 15318/09, § 38, 11 décembre 2012 et Yuriy Slyusar c. Ukraine, no 39797/05, § 82, 17 janvier 2013).
• EGMR, 12.03.2015 - 61876/08

  SERDYUK v. UKRAINE

  While this is an obligation of means rather than that of a result, a requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in it (see, e.g., Gongadze v. Ukraine, no. 34056/02, §§ 175-177, ECHR 2005; Merkulova v. Ukraine, no. 21454/04, §§ 49-51, March 2011 and Yuriy Slyusar v. Ukraine, no. 39797/05, §§ 76-78 and 82, 17 January 2013 with further references).