Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Banel v. Lithuania
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
- EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 14326/11
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 27229/95
KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
For a positive obligation to arise, it must be established that the authorities knew or ought to have known at the time of the existence of a real and immediate risk to the life of an identified individual and that, if so, they failed to take measures within the scope of their powers which, judged reasonably, might have been expected to avoid that risk (see, amongst other authorities, Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 90, ECHR 2001-III)."For a positive obligation to arise, it must be established that the authorities knew or ought to have known at the time of the existence of a real and immediate risk to the life of an identified individual from the criminal acts of a third party and that they failed to take measures within the scope of their powers which, judged reasonably, might have been expected to avoid that risk" (see Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, §§ 90, ECHR 2001-III).
- EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96
CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
In the sphere of negligence, a civil or disciplinary remedy may suffice (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I, and Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 90, ECHR 2002-VIII).In cases of unintentional death, the Court is not required to consider the merits of a complaint regarding a criminal remedy where the applicant, in choosing to forgo a civil remedy, has "denied [herself] access to the best means - and one that, in the special circumstances of the instant case, would have satisfied the positive obligations arising under Article 2 - of elucidating the extent" of the responsibility for her child's death (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 55, ECHR 2002-I).
- EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 53924/00
Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens durch EMRK - Schwangerschaftsabbruch nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
Thus, for example, the State's positive obligation under Article 2 has also been found to be engaged in the health care sector, be it public or private, as regards acts or omissions on the part of health professionals (see Dodov v. Bulgaria, no. 59548/00, §§ 70, 79-83 and 87, 17 January 2008; Byrzykowski v. Poland, no. 11562/05, §§ 104 and 106, 27 June 2006; and Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, §§ 89-90, ECHR 2004-VIII, with further references), as well as in respect of the management of dangerous activities (see Öneryıldız, cited above, § 71) and ensuring safety on board a ship (see Leray and Others v. France (dec.), no. 44617/98, 16 January 2008) or on building sites (see Pereira Henriques and Others v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 60255/00, 26 August 2003).
- EGMR, 24.10.2002 - 37703/97
Verantwortung des Staates für Mord durch beurlaubte Gefangene; Verpflichtung des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
In the sphere of negligence, a civil or disciplinary remedy may suffice (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 51, ECHR 2002-I, and Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 90, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93
MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
It reiterates that although the Convention does not as such guarantee a right to have criminal proceedings instituted against third parties, the Court has said on a number of occasions that the effective judicial system required by Article 2 may, and under certain circumstances must, include recourse to the criminal law (see, among other authorities, Kılıç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 62, ECHR 2000-III, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 85, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see, among many other authorities, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 109, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22492/93
KILIÇ v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
It reiterates that although the Convention does not as such guarantee a right to have criminal proceedings instituted against third parties, the Court has said on a number of occasions that the effective judicial system required by Article 2 may, and under certain circumstances must, include recourse to the criminal law (see, among other authorities, Kılıç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 62, ECHR 2000-III, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 85, ECHR 2000-III). - EGMR, 27.11.2007 - 37393/02
RAJKOWSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 14326/11
In addition, the extent of the State's positive obligation under Article 2 has been addressed by the Court in the context of road safety (see, for example, Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007).