Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 12981/15 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TASHUYEV v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
TASHUYEV v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 38450/05
SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 12981/15
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 18. For a summary of the relevant domestic law, see Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, §§ 33-37 and 65-90, ECHR 2013 (extracts) and Maskhadova and Others v. Russia, no. 18071/05, §§ 116-46, 6 June 2013.Merits 25. The Court observes that both parties to this case relied in their written submissions on the Court's findings in its judgment in the case of Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, ECHR 2013 (extracts).
- EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 18071/05
MASKHADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 12981/15
RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 18. For a summary of the relevant domestic law, see Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, §§ 33-37 and 65-90, ECHR 2013 (extracts) and Maskhadova and Others v. Russia, no. 18071/05, §§ 116-46, 6 June 2013.The submissions by the parties 21. The Government maintained that the decision of 25 April 2016 had been taken pursuant to the Suppression of Terrorism Act, the Interment and Burial Act and the decree on combating terrorism and was justified in view of the reasons provided by the Constitutional Court in its ruling of 28 June 2007 (see Maskhadova and Others, v. Russia, no. 18071/05, § 125, 6 June 2013).
- EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 7988/09
ZALOV AND KHAKULOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 12981/15
The Court further notes that the cited judgment, as well as the judgments in the cases of Zalov and Khakulova, no. 7988/09, 16 January 2014 and Arkhestov and Others, no. 22089/07, 16 January 2014, concerned the terrorist attacks in the Republic of Kabardino-Balkariya, and that the applicants in the cited cases raised similar complaints under Article 8 of the Convention with regard to the domestic authorities" refusal to return the bodies of their deceased relatives. - EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 22089/07
ARKHESTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 12981/15
The Court further notes that the cited judgment, as well as the judgments in the cases of Zalov and Khakulova, no. 7988/09, 16 January 2014 and Arkhestov and Others, no. 22089/07, 16 January 2014, concerned the terrorist attacks in the Republic of Kabardino-Balkariya, and that the applicants in the cited cases raised similar complaints under Article 8 of the Convention with regard to the domestic authorities" refusal to return the bodies of their deceased relatives.