Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 36733/06, 36738/06, 36880/06, 37137/06, 39748/06, 42117/06, 48231/06, 48836/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 36733/06, 36738/06, 36880/06, 37137/06, 39748/06, 42117/06, 48231/06, 48836/06 (https://dejure.org/2013,31014)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22.01.2013 - 36733/06, 36738/06, 36880/06, 37137/06, 39748/06, 42117/06, 48231/06, 48836/06 (https://dejure.org/2013,31014)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22. Januar 2013 - 36733/06, 36738/06, 36880/06, 37137/06, 39748/06, 42117/06, 48231/06, 48836/06 (https://dejure.org/2013,31014)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,31014) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 10597/03
Rechtssache O. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 36733/06
Acknowledging that the primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention lies with the domestic authorities, the Court has already concluded to the effect that a civil action for compensation is, in principle, an effective remedy with regard to the length of proceedings (see Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 59, ECHR 2005-X; Jazbec v. Slovenia, no. 31489/02, § 75, 14 December 2006; Varacha v. Slovenia, no. 9303/02, § 32, 9 November 2006, and Lakota v. Slovenia, no. 33488/02, § 35, 7 December 2006; a contrario, Ommer v. Germany (no. 1), no. 10597/03, § 75, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98
SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 36733/06
Under Article 41 the purpose of awarding sums by way of just satisfaction is to provide reparation solely for damage suffered by those concerned to the extent that such damage constitutes the consequence of a violation that cannot otherwise be remedied (see Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 250, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 46, 24 October 2002). - EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 9303/02
VARACHA v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 36733/06
Acknowledging that the primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention lies with the domestic authorities, the Court has already concluded to the effect that a civil action for compensation is, in principle, an effective remedy with regard to the length of proceedings (see Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 59, ECHR 2005-X; Jazbec v. Slovenia, no. 31489/02, § 75, 14 December 2006; Varacha v. Slovenia, no. 9303/02, § 32, 9 November 2006, and Lakota v. Slovenia, no. 33488/02, § 35, 7 December 2006; a contrario, Ommer v. Germany (no. 1), no. 10597/03, § 75, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 31489/02
JAZBEC v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 36733/06
Acknowledging that the primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention lies with the domestic authorities, the Court has already concluded to the effect that a civil action for compensation is, in principle, an effective remedy with regard to the length of proceedings (see Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 59, ECHR 2005-X; Jazbec v. Slovenia, no. 31489/02, § 75, 14 December 2006; Varacha v. Slovenia, no. 9303/02, § 32, 9 November 2006, and Lakota v. Slovenia, no. 33488/02, § 35, 7 December 2006; a contrario, Ommer v. Germany (no. 1), no. 10597/03, § 75, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 33488/02
LAKOTA v. SLOVENIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 36733/06
Acknowledging that the primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention lies with the domestic authorities, the Court has already concluded to the effect that a civil action for compensation is, in principle, an effective remedy with regard to the length of proceedings (see Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 59, ECHR 2005-X; Jazbec v. Slovenia, no. 31489/02, § 75, 14 December 2006; Varacha v. Slovenia, no. 9303/02, § 32, 9 November 2006, and Lakota v. Slovenia, no. 33488/02, § 35, 7 December 2006; a contrario, Ommer v. Germany (no. 1), no. 10597/03, § 75, 13 November 2008).