Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 272/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,58630) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 272/03
As to the applicant's argument concerning refusal to grant her free legal assistance, the Court recalls that, although Article 6 § 1 of the Convention does not guarantee a right to free legal aid in all civil cases, the unavailability of legal aid may under certain circumstances give rise to a violation of the right of access to court and to a fair hearing, either because legal representation is rendered compulsory, or by reason of the complexity of the procedure of the case (see Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, §§ 24-26). - EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 46311/99
McVICAR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 272/03
The question whether or not Article 6 § 1 requires the provision of legal representation to an individual litigant will depend upon the specific circumstances of the case and, in particular, upon whether the individual would be able to present his case properly and satisfactorily without the assistance of a lawyer (see McVicar v. the United Kingdom, no. 46311/99, § 48, ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 07.01.2003 - 44912/98
KOPECKÝ v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 272/03
In any event, the Court has held that, while it is true that from the ratification date onwards all of the State's acts and omissions must conform to the Convention, the Convention imposes no specific obligation on the Contracting States to provide redress for wrongs or damage caused prior to that date (see Blecic, cited above, § 81; and Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 38, ECHR 2004-...). - EGMR, 28.02.2002 - 59109/00
JOVANOVIC contre la CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 272/03
The Court considers that the applicant's dismissal from her work was an instantaneous act, which did not produce any continuous situation of a violation of the Convention (compare with Jovanovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 59109/00, ECHR 2002-III).
- VG Magdeburg, 19.04.2012 - 7 A 191/11 Die dagegen erhobene Klage wurde durch rechtskräftiges Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichts Magdeburg vom 29.9.2003 - 7 A 272/03 MD - abgewiesen.