Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 25.04.2002 - 59341/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,32814) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MULTIGESTION contre la FRANCE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 7 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MULTIGESTION v. FRANCE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 7 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84
CARDOT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 25.04.2002 - 59341/00
Thus a complaint intended to be submitted to the Court must first have been made, at least in substance, and in compliance with the formal requirements and time-limits laid down in domestic law, to the appropriate domestic courts (see Cardot v. France, judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 19, § 36).
- EGMR, 08.09.2020 - 51127/18
STEFANOV v. BULGARIA
In the light of the Bulgarian courts" recent tendency, including in proceedings under the 1988 Act, to engage more broadly with arguments based on the Convention by reason of its being directly applicable in domestic law (see paragraph 52 above), it cannot automatically be presumed that in such proceedings they would treat arguments based on Article 10 of the Convention as irrelevant (contrast Kandzhov, cited above, § 49, which predated the domestic judgments cited in paragraph 52 above, and compare with Multigestion v. France (dec.), no. 59341/00, ECHR 2002-V (extracts), and Peacock v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 52335/12, § 37, 5 January 2016).