Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AMUYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 17321/06

  In previous cases the Court has already found the reference to Article 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure insufficient to justify the withholding of key information requested by the Court (see Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 123, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 21894/93

  AKKUM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 17321/06

  Having examined the parties" submissions, and drawing inferences from the Government's failure to submit documents which were in their exclusive possession or to provide another plausible explanation for the events in question (see ToÄ?cu v. Turkey, no. 27601/95, § 95, 31 May 2005, and Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, § 211, ECHR 2005-II (extracts)), the Court finds that Aslambek Israilov, Adam Israilov, Turpal Israilov and Aslanbek Dzhabrailov were killed on 7 February 2000 by State servicemen during a security operation.
• EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 46231/99

  AYDIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 17321/06

  The Court further reiterates that in a number of cases concerning ongoing investigations into the deaths of applicants" relatives it has examined the period of time from which the applicant can or should start doubting the effectiveness of a remedy and its bearing on the six-month time-limit provided for in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Sükran Aydın and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46231/99, 26 May 2005; Elsanova v. Russia (dec.) no. 57952/00, 15 November 2005; and Narin v. Turkey, no. 18907/02, § 50, 15 December 2009).
• EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 18907/02

  NARIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 17321/06

  The Court further reiterates that in a number of cases concerning ongoing investigations into the deaths of applicants" relatives it has examined the period of time from which the applicant can or should start doubting the effectiveness of a remedy and its bearing on the six-month time-limit provided for in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Sükran Aydın and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46231/99, 26 May 2005; Elsanova v. Russia (dec.) no. 57952/00, 15 November 2005; and Narin v. Turkey, no. 18907/02, § 50, 15 December 2009).
• EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 57952/00

  ELSANOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 17321/06

  The Court further reiterates that in a number of cases concerning ongoing investigations into the deaths of applicants" relatives it has examined the period of time from which the applicant can or should start doubting the effectiveness of a remedy and its bearing on the six-month time-limit provided for in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Sükran Aydın and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46231/99, 26 May 2005; Elsanova v. Russia (dec.) no. 57952/00, 15 November 2005; and Narin v. Turkey, no. 18907/02, § 50, 15 December 2009).

• EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 53036/08

  PITSAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In addition to their references to the case of Varnava and Others v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, ECHR 2009-), the applicants also cited, amongst others, the cases of Tsechoyev v. Russia (no. 39358/05, 15 March 2011) and Amuyeva and Others v. Russia (no. 17321/06, 25 November 2010).