Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PANNULLO ET FORTE c. FRANCE

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 8 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PANNULLO AND FORTE v. FRANCE

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 8 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 37794/97
• EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 37794/97
• EGMR, 30.10.2001 - 37794/97

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.10.2001 - 37794/97

  In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and the community as a whole, and in both contexts the State is recognised as enjoying a certain margin of appreciation (see Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 20, § 55).

• EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 61243/08

  ELBERTE v. LATVIA

  In the case of Pannullo and Forte v. France (no. 37794/97, § 36, ECHR 2001-X), the Court considered the excessive delay by the French authorities in returning the body of their child following an autopsy to be an interference with the private and family life of the applicants.
• EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 4605/05

  PETROVA v. LATVIA

  In the case of Pannullo and Forte v. France (no. 37794/97, § 36, ECHR 2001-X), the Court considered the excessive delay by the French authorities in returning the body of their child following an autopsy to be interference with the private and family life of the applicants.
• EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 38450/05

  SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Dans les affaires Pannullo et Forte c. France (no 37794/97, §§ 35-36, CEDH 2001-X) et Girard c. France (no 22590/04, § 107, 30 juin 2011), la Cour a reconnu qu'un délai excessif dans la restitution d'un corps après autopsie ou de prélèvements après achèvement d'une procédure pénale pouvait constituer une ingérence dans le droit au respect de la « vie privée'et de la « vie familiale'des proches survivants.

 
• EGMR, 06.06.2013 - 18071/05

  MASKHADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the cases of Pannullo and Forte v. France (no. 37794/97, §§ 35-36, ECHR 2001-X) and Girard v. France (no. 22590/04, § 107, 30 June 2011) the Court recognised that an excessive delay in the restitution of a body after an autopsy or samples of the body after the end of relevant criminal proceedings may constitute an interference with both the "private life" and the "family life" of the surviving family members.
• EGMR, 12.06.2014 - 50132/12

  MARIC v. CROATIA

  It has considered the "private life" aspect of Article 8 to be applicable to the question of whether a mother had the right to change the family name on the tombstone of her stillborn child (see Znamenskaya v. Russia, no. 77785/01, § 27, 2 June 2005), and also the excessive delay by the domestic authorities in returning the body of the applicants" child following an autopsy to be an interference with the private and family life of the applicants (see Pannullo and Forte v. France, no. 37794/97, § 36, ECHR 2001-X), just as the refusal of the investigative authorities to return the suspects body to his relatives (see Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, § 123, ECHR 2013 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 21885/07

  KUSHTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the cases of Pannullo and Forte v. France (no. 37794/97, §§ 35-36, ECHR 2001-X) and Girard v. France (no. 22590/04, § 107, 30 June 2011) the Court recognised that an excessive delay in the restitution of the body after an autopsy or of bodily samples on completion of the relevant criminal proceedings may constitute an interference with both the "private life" and the "family life" of the surviving family members.
• EGMR, 30.06.2011 - 22590/04

  GIRARD c. FRANCE

  Il rappelle les affaires similaires (X c. République fédérale d"Allemagne, décision de la Commission du 10 mars 1981, no 8741/79, Décisions et rapports 24, p. 137, Pannullo et Forte c. France, 37794/97, § 36, CEDH 2001-X, Elli Poluhas Dödsbo c. Suède, no 61564/00 CEDH 2006-I et Hadri-Vionnet c. Suisse, no 5525/00, CEDH 2008-...), dans lesquelles tant la Commission que la Cour ont considéré que l'article 8 était applicable.
• EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 22089/07

  ARKHESTOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the cases of Pannullo and Forte v. France (no. 37794/97, §§ 35-36, ECHR 2001-X) and Girard v. France (no. 22590/04, § 107, 30 June 2011) the Court recognised that an excessive delay in the restitution of the body after an autopsy or of bodily samples on completion of the relevant criminal proceedings may constitute an interference with both the "private life" and the "family life" of the surviving family members.
• EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 7988/09

  ZALOV AND KHAKULOVA v. RUSSIA

  In the cases of Pannullo and Forte v. France (no. 37794/97, §§ 35-36, ECHR 2001-X) and Girard v. France (no. 22590/04, § 107, 30 June 2011) the Court recognised that an excessive delay in the restitution of the body after an autopsy or of bodily samples on completion of the relevant criminal proceedings may constitute an interference with both the "private life" and the "family life" of the surviving family members.
• EGMR, 13.09.2005 - 42639/04

  JONES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  While it is not excluded that respect for family and private life extends to certain situations after death, for example, the ability to attend a close relative's funeral (Ploski v. Poland, no. 26761/95, judgment of 12 November 2002, § 32) or delay by the authorities in releasing a child's body to the parents for a funeral (Pannullo and Forte v. France, no. 37794/97, ECHR 2001-X), there is no right as such to obtain any particular mode of funeral or attendant burial features.
• EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 38552/05

  ABDULAYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 23082/07

  TZILIVAKI AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
• EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 46569/11

  BOUILLE c. FRANCE