Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WALLIN v. SWEDEN
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WALLIN c. SUEDE
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (10)
- EGMR, 29.05.1986 - 9384/81
Deumeland ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
Of particular interest in this context are the two judgments in the Deumeland case (Eur. Court H.R., Deumeland judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 100) and the Feldbrugge case (Eur. Court H.R., Feldbrugge judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99) in which the Court found certain social security benefits to be "civil rights" within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention.In the Feldbrugge case (Eur. Court H.R., Feldbrugge judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99) and the Deumeland case (Eur. Court H.R., Deumeland judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 100), the European Court of Human Rights examined the applicability of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention to certain disputes in the field of social security, notably a sickness insurance scheme in the Netherlands (Feldbrugge case) and an industrial-accident insurance scheme in the Federal Republic of Germany (Deumeland case).
- EGMR, 29.05.1986 - 8562/79
FELDBRUGGE v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
Of particular interest in this context are the two judgments in the Deumeland case (Eur. Court H.R., Deumeland judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 100) and the Feldbrugge case (Eur. Court H.R., Feldbrugge judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99) in which the Court found certain social security benefits to be "civil rights" within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention.In the Feldbrugge case (Eur. Court H.R., Feldbrugge judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99) and the Deumeland case (Eur. Court H.R., Deumeland judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 100), the European Court of Human Rights examined the applicability of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention to certain disputes in the field of social security, notably a sickness insurance scheme in the Netherlands (Feldbrugge case) and an industrial-accident insurance scheme in the Federal Republic of Germany (Deumeland case).
- EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73
König ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
What is decisive is the right at issue (see Eur. Court H.R., König judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, pp. 29-30, paras. 88-89).
- EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
The European Court of Human Rights has also adopted this view and, furthermore, recognised that the waiver could be tacit (see e.g., Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 25, para. 49, and Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 25, para. 59). - EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75
DEWEER c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
The European Court of Human Rights has also adopted this view and, furthermore, recognised that the waiver could be tacit (see e.g., Eur. Court H.R., Deweer judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 25, para. 49, and Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 25, para. 59). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 5947/72
SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
This provision has been interpreted to mean that everyone has a right to an effective remedy on the condition that he has "an arguable claim to be the victim of a violation" (see Eur. Court H.R., Silver and others judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 42, para. 113). - EGMR, 13.07.1983 - 8737/79
Zimmermann und Steiner ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
When considering the conduct of authorities, the European Court of Human Rights has consistently recognised that an otherwise unacceptable delay in the examination of a case is justified if caused by "a temporary backlog of business" provided that the state has "taken reasonably prompt remedial action to deal with an exceptional situation of this kind" (see e.g. Eur. Court H.R. Buchholz judgment of 6 May 1981, Series A no. 42, p. 16, para. 51, and Zimmermann and Steiner, judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no. 66, p. 12, para. 29). - EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 7987/77
COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
The Commission refers, on this point, to its constant case-law (see e.g. No. 458/59, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222, 236 ; No. 5258/71, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77 ; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45). - EGMR, 06.05.1981 - 7759/77
Buchholz ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
When considering the conduct of authorities, the European Court of Human Rights has consistently recognised that an otherwise unacceptable delay in the examination of a case is justified if caused by "a temporary backlog of business" provided that the state has "taken reasonably prompt remedial action to deal with an exceptional situation of this kind" (see e.g. Eur. Court H.R. Buchholz judgment of 6 May 1981, Series A no. 42, p. 16, para. 51, and Zimmermann and Steiner, judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no. 66, p. 12, para. 29). - EKMR, 08.02.1973 - 5258/71
X. v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EKMR, 08.03.1988 - 11450/85
The Commission refers, on this point, to its constant case-law (see e.g. No. 458/59, Dec. 29.3.60, Yearbook 3 pp. 222, 236 ; No. 5258/71, Dec. 8.2.73, Collection 43 pp. 71, 77 ; No. 7987/77, Dec. 13.12.79, D.R. 18 pp. 31, 45).
- EKMR, 12.12.1988 - 12257/86
CINNAN v. SWEDEN
As regards Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention, it is recalled that in a previous application against Sweden (No. 11450/85, Dec. 8.3.88, to be published in D.R.) the Commission has held that Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention does not apply to disputes over sickness benefits under the Swedish social security system as provided for in the Social Insurance Act, since such disputes do not relate to a "civil" right within the meaning of Article 6 para.