Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TÍMÁR v. HUNGARY

  Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 5 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

  RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1997 - 23209/94

  Nevertheless, it is to be taken into account when assessing the reasonableness of the length of the subsequent proceedings (cf. Eur. Court HR, Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 37, para. 6; Ringeisen v. Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, pp. 41-42, para. 101; Foti and Others v. Italy judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, para. 53; Pretto and Others v. Italy judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71, p. 14, para. 30; mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court HR, Yagci et Sargin v. Turkey judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319, p. 16, para. 40).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

  Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1997 - 23209/94

  Nevertheless, it is to be taken into account when assessing the reasonableness of the length of the subsequent proceedings (cf. Eur. Court HR, Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 37, para. 6; Ringeisen v. Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, pp. 41-42, para. 101; Foti and Others v. Italy judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, para. 53; Pretto and Others v. Italy judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71, p. 14, para. 30; mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court HR, Yagci et Sargin v. Turkey judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319, p. 16, para. 40).
• EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 11760/85

  ÉDITIONS PÉRISCOPE v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1997 - 23209/94

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention (cf., Eur. Court HR, Editions Périscope v. France judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-B, p. 72, para. 40; X v. France judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, p. 90, para. 30).

 
• EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 7984/77

  PRETTO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1997 - 23209/94

  Nevertheless, it is to be taken into account when assessing the reasonableness of the length of the subsequent proceedings (cf. Eur. Court HR, Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 37, para. 6; Ringeisen v. Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, pp. 41-42, para. 101; Foti and Others v. Italy judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, para. 53; Pretto and Others v. Italy judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71, p. 14, para. 30; mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court HR, Yagci et Sargin v. Turkey judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319, p. 16, para. 40).
• EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76

  FOTI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1997 - 23209/94

  Nevertheless, it is to be taken into account when assessing the reasonableness of the length of the subsequent proceedings (cf. Eur. Court HR, Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 37, para. 6; Ringeisen v. Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, pp. 41-42, para. 101; Foti and Others v. Italy judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, para. 53; Pretto and Others v. Italy judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71, p. 14, para. 30; mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court HR, Yagci et Sargin v. Turkey judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319, p. 16, para. 40).
• EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90

  YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1997 - 23209/94

  Nevertheless, it is to be taken into account when assessing the reasonableness of the length of the subsequent proceedings (cf. Eur. Court HR, Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 37, para. 6; Ringeisen v. Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, pp. 41-42, para. 101; Foti and Others v. Italy judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, para. 53; Pretto and Others v. Italy judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 71, p. 14, para. 30; mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court HR, Yagci et Sargin v. Turkey judgment of 8 June 1995, Series A no. 319, p. 16, para. 40).
• EGMR, 31.03.1992 - 18020/91

  X c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1997 - 23209/94

  1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention (cf., Eur. Court HR, Editions Périscope v. France judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-B, p. 72, para. 40; X v. France judgment of 31 March 1992, Series A no. 234-C, p. 90, para. 30).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 19753/92

  CIRICOSTA AND VIOLA v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 13.01.1997 - 23209/94

  In this instance the circumstances call for an overall assessment (cf. Eur. Court HR, Vernillo v. Italy judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, p. 12, para. 30; Ciricosta and Viola v. Italy judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 337-A, p. 9, para. 24).