Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  G.F. v. SWITZERLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. b, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

  Öztürk ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 20571/92

  The applicant argues that in this respect his case is similar to that of Öztürk (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Öztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, p. 20, para. 53).
• EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88

  OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 20571/92

  The Convention organs' task is to look at the interference complained of in the light of the case as a whole and determine whether it was "proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued" and whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it are "relevant and sufficient"(cf. European Court H.R., Observer and Guardian judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59).
• EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79

  Barthold ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 20571/92

  The Commission finds that these provisions were accessible, and the disciplinary measure complained of was also foreseeable under the relevant legislation (cf. mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court H.R., Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 21-23, paras. 45-48).

 
• EGMR, 24.02.1995 - 16424/90

  McMICHAEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 20571/92

  The applicant also maintains, with reference to the case of McMichael (cf. Eur. Court H.R., McMichael judgment of 24 February 1995, Series A no. 307-B), that in determining the applicability of Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention not only the severity of the sanction must be considered but also the severity of the interference with the rights protected by the Convention, namely the freedom of expression (of a lawyer before a court) which was at stake in the present case.
• EGMR, 23.03.1994 - 14220/88

  RAVNSBORG v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 20571/92

  In order to determine whether Article 6 (Art. 6) of the Convention is applicable under its "criminal" head to the proceedings at issue, the Commission will have regard to the three criteria laid down in the Convention organs' case-law (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Ravnsborg judgment of 23 March 1994, Series A no. 283-B, p. 28, para. 30, with further references).
• EKMR, 14.03.1985 - 10148/82

  GARCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 18.10.1995 - 20571/92

  The Government maintain, with reference to the Commission's case-law (see, e.g., No. 10148/82, Dec. 14.3.85, D.R. 42 p. 121), that the applicant has failed to comply with the requirement as to the exhaustion of domestic remedies since in his public law appeal he mentioned the freedom of expression only once in passing.