Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 18905/91 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1994,21745) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
R.B. v. SWITZERLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 11.10.1988 - 10868/84
WOUKAM MOUDEFO v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 18905/91
Only when these two conditions are satisfied does the subsidiary nature of the protective mechanism of the Convention preclude examination of an application (see Eur. Court H.R., Eckle judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, paras. 69 et seq.; No. 10868/84, dec. 21.1.87, Woukam Moudefo v. France, D.R. 51 p. 62; No. 10884/84, dec. 13.12.84, H. v. Federal Republic of Germany, D.R. 41 p. 252).In these circumstances it is unnecessary to examine whether the reduction from originally 24 months' to sixteen months' imprisonment may be considered as a sufficiently substantial reduction (see mutatis mutandis No. 10868/84, Woukam Moudefo v. France, loc. cit.).
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 18905/91
Only when these two conditions are satisfied does the subsidiary nature of the protective mechanism of the Convention preclude examination of an application (see Eur. Court H.R., Eckle judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, paras. 69 et seq.; No. 10868/84, dec. 21.1.87, Woukam Moudefo v. France, D.R. 51 p. 62; No. 10884/84, dec. 13.12.84, H. v. Federal Republic of Germany, D.R. 41 p. 252). - EKMR, 13.12.1984 - 10884/84
H. v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 18905/91
Only when these two conditions are satisfied does the subsidiary nature of the protective mechanism of the Convention preclude examination of an application (see Eur. Court H.R., Eckle judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, paras. 69 et seq.; No. 10868/84, dec. 21.1.87, Woukam Moudefo v. France, D.R. 51 p. 62; No. 10884/84, dec. 13.12.84, H. v. Federal Republic of Germany, D.R. 41 p. 252).