Weitere Entscheidungen unten: EGMR, 29.04.2015 | EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,16678
EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08 (https://dejure.org/2012,16678)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22.05.2012 - 1099/08 (https://dejure.org/2012,16678)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 22. Mai 2012 - 1099/08 (https://dejure.org/2012,16678)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16678) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

  • EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

    Opuz ./. Türkei

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
    Violations have also been found where the trial had continued unduly (see Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 151, ECHR 2009, a case where the criminal proceedings at issue had lasted for more than six years and were still pending) or had ended by prescription allowing the accused perpetrators to escape accountability (see, mutatis mutandis, Teren Aksakal v. Turkey, no. 51967/99, § 88, 11 September 2007).
  • EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 51967/99

    TEREN AKSAKAL v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
    Violations have also been found where the trial had continued unduly (see Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 151, ECHR 2009, a case where the criminal proceedings at issue had lasted for more than six years and were still pending) or had ended by prescription allowing the accused perpetrators to escape accountability (see, mutatis mutandis, Teren Aksakal v. Turkey, no. 51967/99, § 88, 11 September 2007).
  • EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
    This investigation must be effective in the sense that it is capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see OÄ?ur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 88, ECHR 1999-III).
  • EGMR, 08.03.2006 - 59532/00

    BLECIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
    Pursuant to the general rules of international law (notably, Article 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties), the Convention does not bind a Contracting Party in relation to any act or fact which took place or any situation which ceased to exist before its entry into force with respect to that Party (see Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 70, ECHR 2006-III).
  • EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97

    BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
    The Court has held in cases concerning the obligation to investigate under Article 2 of the Convention that where a death has occurred, applicant relatives are expected to keep track of the progress of the proceedings and to lodge their applications with due expedition once they are, or should have become, aware of the lack of any effective redress (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002; Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III; and Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 73065/01

    BULUT and YAVUZ v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
    The Court has held in cases concerning the obligation to investigate under Article 2 of the Convention that where a death has occurred, applicant relatives are expected to keep track of the progress of the proceedings and to lodge their applications with due expedition once they are, or should have become, aware of the lack of any effective redress (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002; Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III; and Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 69481/01

    BAZORKINA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
    Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines this ability may risk falling foul of the said standard (see, among other authorities, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, § 118, 27 July 2006).
  • EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 46598/06

    BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
    The Court has consistently held that the obligation to protect life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force, either by State officials or by private individuals (see, for example, Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, § 62, 15 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 34698/04

    HACKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
    The Court has also held that circumstances may emerge which cast doubt on the effectiveness of the original investigation and an obligation may arise for further investigations to be pursued (see Hackett v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34698/04, 10 May 2005).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 29.04.2015 - 1099/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2015,23485
EGMR, 29.04.2015 - 1099/08 (https://dejure.org/2015,23485)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29.04.2015 - 1099/08 (https://dejure.org/2015,23485)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29. April 2015 - 1099/08 (https://dejure.org/2015,23485)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,23485) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MLADENOVIC AGAINST SERBIA

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MLADENOVIC CONTRE LA SERBIE

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR - 1099/08   

Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/9999,83644
EGMR - 1099/08 (https://dejure.org/9999,83644)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,83644) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Sonstiges

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97

    BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR - 1099/08
    Having regard to the issue under the procedural aspect of Article 2, has the applicant complied with the six-month time-limit laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002; Bayram and Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III; and Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 73065/01

    BULUT and YAVUZ v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR - 1099/08
    Having regard to the issue under the procedural aspect of Article 2, has the applicant complied with the six-month time-limit laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002; Bayram and Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III; and Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos.
  • EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 46598/06

    BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR - 1099/08
    Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life (see, for example, Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, § 62, ECHR 2009-... (extracts)), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 2 of the Convention?.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht