Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BAYRAM et YILDIRIM contre la TURQUIE
Art. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (132)
- EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 5418/15
Bootsunglück vor Farmakonisi: Griechenland muss Flüchtlinge entschädigen
Dès lors, les requérants sont censés prendre des mesures pour se tenir au courant de l'état d'avancement de l'enquête, ou de sa stagnation, et introduire leurs requêtes avec la célérité voulue dès lors qu'ils savent, ou devraient savoir, qu'aucune enquête pénale effective n'est menée (Bulut et Yavuz c. Turquie (déc.), no 73065/01, 28 mai 2002, et Bayram et Yildirim c. Turquie (déc.), no 38587/97, CEDH 2002-III). - EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
MOCANU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
Its primary purpose is to maintain legal certainty by ensuring that cases raising issues under the Convention are examined within a reasonable time, and to prevent the authorities and other persons concerned from being kept in a state of uncertainty for a long period of time (see Sabri Günes v. Turkey [GC], no. 27396/06, § 39, 29 June 2012; El Masri v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" [GC], no. 39630/09, § 135, ECHR 2012; and Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 18.09.2009 - 16064/90
VARNAVA ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Consequently, where a death has occurred, applicant relatives are expected to take steps to keep track of the investigation's progress, or lack thereof, and to lodge their applications with due expedition once they are, or should have become, aware of the lack of any effective criminal investigation (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002; also Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III).
- EGMR, 12.04.2016 - 12060/12
M.C. AND A.C. v. ROMANIA
It was due to their own negligence that they had failed to act more expeditiously (they refer to Bayram and Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III).The Court has already held that, in cases concerning an investigation into ill-treatment, as in those concerning an investigation into the suspicious death of a relative, applicants are expected to take steps to keep track of the investigation's progress, or lack thereof, and to lodge their applications with due expedition once they are, or should have become, aware of the lack of any effective criminal investigation (see Bayram and Yildirim v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III).
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 26088/06
STANIMIROVIC v. SERBIA
The Court has held in cases concerning the obligation to investigate under Article 2 of the Convention that where a death has occurred, applicant relatives are expected to keep track of the progress of the investigation and to lodge their applications with due expedition once they are, or should have become, aware of the lack of any effective investigation (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002; Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III; and Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos.The Court has held in cases concerning the obligation to investigate under Article 2 of the Convention that where a death has occurred, the victim's relatives are expected to keep track of the progress of the investigation and to lodge their application with due expedition once they are, or should have become, aware of the lack of any effective investigation (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002; Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III; and Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos.
- EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 3598/03
MERYEM ÇELIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Relying on the Court's decisions in the cases of Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III); Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002); and Hazar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), nos.Furthermore, it ought also to protect the authorities and other persons concerned from being under any uncertainty for a prolonged period of time (see Bulut and Yavuz (dec.), cited above and Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III).
- EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 37869/08
VATANDAS c. TURQUIE
Se référant aux décisions Bayram et Yildirim c. Turquie ((déc.), no 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III), et Bulut et Yavuz c. Turquie ((déc.) no 73065/01, 28 mai 2002), il invite ainsi la Cour à déclarer la requête irrecevable aux motifs que le requérant n'a pas respecté le délai de six mois et qu'il n'a pas fait preuve de diligence quant à la poursuite de ses griefs.Il faut rappeler que les intéressés sont effectivement censés prendre des mesures pour se tenir informés de l'état d'avancement de l'enquête, ou de sa stagnation, et introduire leurs requêtes avec la célérité voulue dès lors qu'ils savent, ou devraient savoir, qu'aucune enquête pénale effective n'est menée (Bayram et Yildirim c. Turquie (déc.), no 38587/97, CEDH 2002-III, et Bulut et Yavuz c. Turquie (déc.), no 73065/01, 28 mai 2002).
- EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 27872/03
GASYAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Referring in particular to the decision in the case of Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III), the Government submitted that the applicants, who claim that the investigation was ineffective, should have introduced their application within a reasonable time after the bodies of their relatives had been found in April 1994.The Court noted that it had held in the case of Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III), referred to by the Government, and in a number of other similar cases that, if no domestic remedies were available or if they were judged to be ineffective, the six-month time-limit in principle ran from the date of the act complained of.
- EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 35801/03
MASSON c. FRANCE
La Cour rappelle que la règle des six mois, prescrite à l'article 35 § 1 de la Convention, a pour objet d'assurer la sécurité juridique et de veiller à ce que les affaires litigieuses au regard de la Convention soient examinées dans un délai raisonnable, ainsi que de protéger les autorités et autres personnes concernées de l'incertitude dans laquelle elles seraient laissées, du fait de l'écoulement prolongé du temps (voir Bulut et Yavuz c. Turquie (déc.), no 73065/01, 28 mai 2002, et Bayram et Yıldırım c. Turquie (déc.), no 38587/97, CEDH 2002-III).En pareil cas, la période de six mois peut être calculée à partir de cette date (voir, entre autres, Bayram et Yıldırım c. Turquie (déc), no 38587/97, 29 janvier 2002, Bulut et Yavuz, précité, et Paul et Audrey Edwards c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 46477/99, 7 juin 2001).
- EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 10/10
BRUNNER v. TURKEY
In such a situation, the six-month period might be calculated from the time when the applicant becomes aware, or should have become aware, of these circumstances (see Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III; and Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. - EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 23502/06
Bomben auf kurdische Dörfer: Türkei muss Schmerzensgeld zahlen
- EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 73065/01
BULUT and YAVUZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 23016/04
ER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 28.10.2004 - 48173/99
Y.B. ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.12.2019 - 43478/11
HAMBARDZUMYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 12.12.2013 - 40146/11
KANAKIS c. GRÈCE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 25.01.2022 - 28864/18
GRIBBEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 22.01.2019 - 10015/10
BASAR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10
RANDELOVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 7524/06
CÜLAZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 21099/06
YETISEN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 13660/05
TEKÇI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.09.2007 - 51967/99
TEREN AKSAKAL v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.07.2006 - 53489/99
KAVAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 2429/13
SARI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 11.09.2018 - 29753/16
CHONG AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 44814/07
KADRI BUDAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 46231/99
AYDIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 11.04.2019 - 38089/12
SARWARI ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 52577/15
TODOROVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 3534/06
INCIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.02.2013 - 24589/04
BOZKIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 04.11.2021 - 32427/16
PETROSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 58026/12
AKIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.05.2018 - 48176/11
TORLAK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 714/08
BATMAZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 44425/08
BAKLANOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 25.09.2012 - 30689/05
KIRLANGIÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 1099/08
MLADENOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 44021/07
AYSU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 51987/07
ATALLAH c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 35802/05
FRANDES c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 22746/03
ÖLMEZ ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 18907/02
NARIN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.04.2007 - 29453/02
R. C. gegen Deutschland
- EGMR - 1099/08 (anhängig)
[ENG]
- EGMR, 15.11.2022 - 3934/17
SASKIN ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 61016/16
SENGÜL ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 06.02.2020 - 40394/10
SAKVARELIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 06.07.2017 - 80960/12
ZDJELAR AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 39468/13
OBAJDIN v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 48409/06
SAVUN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 38882/13
OPACIC AND GODIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 32036/13
TRESKAVICA v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 22026/10
AKHVLEDIANI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 40787/10
TASÇI AND DUMAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 54415/09
DEARI AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 20106/06
MARTA JULARIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 3575/05
EMRAH AYDINLAR ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.07.2008 - 11381/02
TONKA ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.11.2005 - 57952/00
ELSANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 13635/04
KINIS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.06.2002 - 28298/95
BULDAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 79650/16
ARSLAN c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 9477/12
AKBULUT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 18.09.2018 - 4800/10
SHAVLOKHOVA v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 28361/14
NAUMOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 4078/15
FEJZIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 520/12
BESTAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 49448/08
MANUKIAN v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 04.02.2016 - 24723/05
KIRAKOSYAN v. ARMENIA (No. 2)
- EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 62101/12
KIZILÖZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 48528/11
IS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 19256/13
VULETIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 6629/10
UYSAL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 56094/12
GRUBIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 75504/12
RADICANIN AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 21135/09
IREZIYEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 5676/13
GOJEVIC-ZRNIC AND MANCIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 13.05.2014 - 50203/12
ORIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 33614/10
ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 37204/02
GUSAR v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND ROMANIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 31248/09
HAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 33898/11
FINDIK v. TURKEY AND OMER V. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 53073/07
MANUKYAN v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 17502/07
AVOTINS c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 2913/04
PIKOVÁ c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 43422/04
COSTAS & THOMAS ORPHANOU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 45533/05
GADI c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 25060/02
ERDAL ASLAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 29098/03
KIZIL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.04.2008 - 13745/02
OZTURK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.09.2005 - 47279/99
YOSIFOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 63181/00
KARAYIGIT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 42428/98
EREN et AUTRES contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR - 34782/10 (anhängig)
DEMCHUK AND SHPARTAK v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 07.10.2021 - 5748/17
RYZHOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 72080/12
SHAVADZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 22.09.2020 - 42235/19
ÖLMEZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 449/12
AKTAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 20436/11
ISRAILOV AND BAKAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 56120/13
BAYSULTANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 67437/09
Russland muss Tschetschenen 260.000 Euro zahlen
- EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 11182/10
DAVITASHVILI v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 12744/13
LONCAR v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 02.06.2015 - 79768/12
KUKAVICA v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 1891/10
SCIABICA c. ITALIE ET ALLEMAGNE
- EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 37678/10
SUBARI AND KOBIDZE v. GEORGIA
- EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 72254/11
BOGDANOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 36732/08
MITRANIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 19985/13
SPATA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 23590/06
ILINOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 31848/11
ÖZSÜREN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 3424/09
DURSUN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 45503/99
KAREFYLLIDES ET AL v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 45631/04
SAGLAM ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 55195/00
TAGAC c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 34542/03
YILDIZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 75527/01
UCAK ET KARGILI c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.03.2004 - 40299/98
BOZTAS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.08.2017 - 27240/09
GISAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 4159/15
KAMENICA AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 17.03.2015 - 36470/06
PETROVIC AND GAJIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 27631/12
VARTIC v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 28883/05
ÇIÇEK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 40047/04
PANTUSHEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 15630/05
RUZICKOVÁ c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 37147/02
CHIRITA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 16.03.2004 - 28290/95
GUNGOR contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 27115/12
VESELINOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 39445/08
YÜKSEL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 71998/01
AYDIN v. TURKEY