Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 13, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97

  BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 33614/10

  Furthermore, it ought also to protect the authorities and other persons concerned from being under any uncertainty for a prolonged period of time (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002, also Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 73065/01

  BULUT and YAVUZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 33614/10

  Furthermore, it ought also to protect the authorities and other persons concerned from being under any uncertainty for a prolonged period of time (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002, also Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 36088/97

  ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 33614/10

  36088/97 and 38417/97, 27 November 2001).

 
• EGMR, 10.01.2002 - 62566/00

  HAZAR, TEKTAS, BEKIROGLU, PEKOL, BOZKUS, TEKTAS, ATMAN, ISIK, AKSUCU, DOSTER, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 33614/10

  In such a situation, the six-month period might be calculated from the time when the applicant becomes aware, or should have become aware, of these circumstances (ibid.; see also Hazar and others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 62566/00, 10 January 2002).
• EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 30742/03

  SEYFETTIN ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 33614/10

  In those cases, taking into account the substantial delays involved and the serious nature of the alleged crimes, the Court held that the criminal proceedings, which had then been pending for over seventeen years, could not be considered as furnishing an effective remedy which the applicants were required to use under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Seyfettin Acar and Others v. Turkey, no. 30742/03, § 24, 6 October 2009; Acar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), nos.
• EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 71998/01

  AYDIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 33614/10

  Although the Court refrained from indicating a specific period for establishing when an investigation has become ineffective for the purposes of assessing when the six-month period begins to run, the determination of such period by the Court depended on the circumstances of each case and other factors such as the diligence and interest displayed by the applicants as well as the adequacy of the investigation in question (see Seyithan Aydın v. Turkey (dec.), no. 71998/01, § 43, 4 March 2008).