Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 (https://dejure.org/2013,7586)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09.04.2013 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 (https://dejure.org/2013,7586)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 09. April 2013 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 (https://dejure.org/2013,7586)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,7586) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AKHVLEDIANI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 22026/10
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10
- EGMR - 22026/10 (anhängig)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97
BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 22026/10
They referred in this regard to the relevant case-law of the Court, and in particular to its decision in a recent case of Manukyan v. Georgia ((dec.), no. 53073/07, 9 October 2012), according to which an applicant claiming a violation under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention must timely take the steps necessary for keeping track of the investigation's progress, or lack thereof, and to lodge their applications with due expedition once they are, or should have become, aware of the lack of any effective criminal investigation (see Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 53073/07
MANUKYAN v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 22026/10
They referred in this regard to the relevant case-law of the Court, and in particular to its decision in a recent case of Manukyan v. Georgia ((dec.), no. 53073/07, 9 October 2012), according to which an applicant claiming a violation under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention must timely take the steps necessary for keeping track of the investigation's progress, or lack thereof, and to lodge their applications with due expedition once they are, or should have become, aware of the lack of any effective criminal investigation (see Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 (https://dejure.org/9999,67488)
EGMR - 22026/10, Entscheidung vom 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 (https://dejure.org/9999,67488)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,67488) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GIORGI AKHVLEDIANI v. GEORGIA and 9 other applications
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 22026/10
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 22026/10
- EGMR - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 (anhängig)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 73065/01
BULUT and YAVUZ v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR - 22026/10
Were the applicants" complaints about their alleged ill-treatment, unlawful deprivation of liberty and interference with their right to respect for their private life during the police raid on Imedi on 7 November 2007 lodged with the Court with the expedition required by the six-month rule laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002, and Aydin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46231/99, 26 May 2005)?. - EGMR, 26.05.2005 - 46231/99
AYDIN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR - 22026/10
Were the applicants" complaints about their alleged ill-treatment, unlawful deprivation of liberty and interference with their right to respect for their private life during the police raid on Imedi on 7 November 2007 lodged with the Court with the expedition required by the six-month rule laid down in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002, and Aydin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46231/99, 26 May 2005)?.
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 (https://dejure.org/2012,15329)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.03.2012 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 (https://dejure.org/2012,15329)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. März 2012 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10 (https://dejure.org/2012,15329)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15329) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AKHVLEDIANI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
Art. 3, Art. 3+13, Art. 13, Art. 5, Art. 5+13, Art. 8, Art. 8+13, Art. 10, Art. 14+P12 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 12 Art. 1 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 22026/10, 22043/10, 22078/10, 22097/10, 22128/10, 27480/10, 27534/10, 27551/10, 27572/10, 27583/10
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 22026/10
- EGMR - 22026/10 (anhängig)