Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ERGÜN v. TURKEY

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 16.04.2002 - 37971/97

  STES COLAS EST AND OTHERS v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 238/06

  In the present case, regard being had to the documents in its possession and the above criteria, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum of EUR 2, 500 to cover costs under all heads (see Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § 56, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 238/06

  The Court reiterates at the outset that Article 3 of the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 238/06

  In the presence of such evidence, the burden therefore rests on the Government to demonstrate by convincing arguments that the use of force during arrest was rendered strictly necessary by the applicant's own behaviour and that the force used by members of the security forces was not excessive (see Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336; Ivan Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 48130/99, § 63, 12 April 2007; Biçici v. Turkey, no. 30357/05, § 34, 27 May 2010; and GazioÄ?lu and Others v. Turkey, no. 29835/05, § 43, 17 May 2011).

 
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 238/06

  The Court considers in particular that medical reports obtained from public or privately owned or run medical establishments may be admitted in evidence by the Court in its examination of allegations of ill-treatment (see, inter alia, Türkan v. Turkey, no. 33086/04, § 44, 18 September 2008), unless they fall significantly short of the standards recommended by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) (see, inter alia, Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X), and the guidelines set out in the Istanbul Protocol (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 100, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 28.11.2000 - 29462/95

  REHBOCK c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 238/06

  In other words, they were not called upon to react without prior preparation (see Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 238/06

  The Court considers in particular that medical reports obtained from public or privately owned or run medical establishments may be admitted in evidence by the Court in its examination of allegations of ill-treatment (see, inter alia, Türkan v. Turkey, no. 33086/04, § 44, 18 September 2008), unless they fall significantly short of the standards recommended by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) (see, inter alia, Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X), and the guidelines set out in the Istanbul Protocol (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 100, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 33086/04

  TÜRKAN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 238/06

  The Court considers in particular that medical reports obtained from public or privately owned or run medical establishments may be admitted in evidence by the Court in its examination of allegations of ill-treatment (see, inter alia, Türkan v. Turkey, no. 33086/04, § 44, 18 September 2008), unless they fall significantly short of the standards recommended by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) (see, inter alia, Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X), and the guidelines set out in the Istanbul Protocol (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 100, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).