Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RIZVANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

  Ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 162, Series A no. 25; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

  1 and 4, Article 3 makes no provision for exceptions and no derogation from it is permissible under Article 15 § 2 even in the event of a public emergency threatening the life of the nation (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V, and Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 93, Reports 1998-VIII).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

  Ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. The assessment of this minimum depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 162, Series A no. 25; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).

 
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

  The Court is sensitive to the subsidiary nature of its role and recognises that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first-instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see, for example, McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

  Such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, among many other authorities, Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

  Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 22684/05

  MURADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

  Nevertheless, where allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see Muradova v. Azerbaijan, no. 22684/05, § 99, 2 April 2009, and Avsar, cited above, §§ 283-84).

• EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 47274/15

  Konflikt zwischen Polizei und Fans ungenügend untersucht

  Der Gerichtshof erinnert daran, dass insoweit eine prompte forensische Untersuchung entscheidend ist, da Anzeichen für Verletzungen häufig recht schnell verschwinden und bestimmte Verletzungen innerhalb von Wochen oder sogar wenigen Tagen heilen können (siehe Rizvanov./. Aserbaidschan, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 31805/06, Rdnrn. 46 und 47, 17. April 2012).
• EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17

  SARDAR BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Accordingly, in so far as the lawyer is entitled to seek payment of his fees under the contract, the applicant may claim reimbursement of those fees (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, § 74, 3 February 2011; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 89, 17 April 2012; Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 97, 1 June 2017; Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, §§ 371-72, 28 November 2017; and Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 32538/10, § 62, 30 January 2020).
• EGMR, 17.10.2019 - 14604/08

  MUSHFIG MAMMADOV ET AUTRES c. AZERBAÏDJAN

  En outre, la Cour considère que les lettres émises par les représentants des requérants, signées uniquement par ceux-ci, ne peuvent passer pour un contrat faisant peser sur les intéressés l'obligation juridique de payer les sommes qui seront réclamées à l'issue de la procédure devant elle (comparer avec Rizvanov c. Azerbaïdjan, no 31805/06, §§ 85-89, 17 avril 2012, et Merabishvili c. Géorgie [GC], no 72508/13, § 372, 28 novembre 2017).

 
• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11

  MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Moreover, unlike the cases in which the applicants were able to produce a contract for legal services, according to which, the amounts due were to be paid in the event that the Court found a violation of the applicants" rights (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, §§ 72-75, 3 February 2011, and Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 85-89, 17 April 2012), in the present case no such a contract was submitted to the Court.
• EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 41452/07

  LENEV v. BULGARIA

  It has also explained that prompt forensic examination is crucial as signs of injury may often disappear quickly and certain injuries may heal within weeks or even a few days (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 47, 17 April 2012).
• EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 34133/17

  ISMAYILOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  A failure to secure forensic evidence in a timely manner is one of the most important factors in assessing the overall effectiveness of an investigation into allegations of ill-treatment (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 59, 17 April 2012).
• EGMR, 24.10.2023 - 21882/09

  ISRAILOV v. RUSSIA

  The Court notes firstly that prompt forensic examination is indeed crucial, as signs of injury may often disappear rather quickly and certain injuries may heal within weeks or even a few days (see, among others, Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 59, 17 April 2012).
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 46505/08

  IGBAL HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Moreover, a wide variety of other evidence, such as witness statement, video recording, tape recording or photograph, may also be submitted in support of the allegation of ill-treatment (see, among many other authorities, Muradova v. Azerbaijan, no. 22684/05, § 108, 2 April 2009; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 48, 17 April 2012; and Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, § 37, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR, 13.05.2014 - 46903/07

  MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  In this connection, the Court notes that it already found in numerous cases against Azerbaijan that lodging a criminal complaint with the police or the prosecution authorities about the alleged ill-treatment or the unlawful use of force by the law-enforcement authorities constituted an effective remedy to be exhausted before lodging a complaint with the Court (see Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 34445/04, §§ 23-27, 11 January 2007; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 16-20, 17 April 2012; and Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, §§ 18-21, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR - 31236/17 (anhängig)

  VAKHAPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  (b) was the recourse to physical force made strictly necessary by the applicants" own conduct (see Dedovskiy and Others v. Russia, no. 7178/03, §§ 82-83, ECHR 2008 (extracts); Gladovic v. Croatia, no. 28847/08, §§ 53-54, 10 May 2011; and Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 49, 17 April 2012)? In particular,.
• EGMR - 75926/17 (anhängig)

  VARZHABETYAN v. RUSSIA