Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.11.2019 - 45084/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,37711) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ADAMCO v. SLOVAKIA
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - ...
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (4)
- EGMR, 25.10.2022 - 68725/16
XENOFONTOS AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
43000/11 and 49380/11, 17 January 2017; and, by contrast, Adamco v. Slovakia, no. 45084/14, 12 November 2019).In making its assessment, the Court will look at the proceedings as a whole, having regard to the rights of the defence but also to the interests of the public and the victims in having crime properly prosecuted and, where necessary, to the rights of witnesses (see Adamco v. Slovakia, no. 45084/14, § 56, 12 November 2019).
- EGMR - 34067/23 (anhängig)
BOU? A v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charge against him, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, given that he was convicted mainly on the basis of a statement given by K.B. who had previously entered into a plea bargain agreement (see, mutatis mutandis, Xenofontos and others v. Cyprus, nos. 8725/16, 74339/16 and 74359/16, 25 October 2022; Adamco v. Slovakia, no. 45084/14, 12 November 2019)?. - EGMR, 02.11.2021 - 35366/15
TARTOUSI c. ROUMANIE
Le risque qu'une personne puisse être accusée et jugée sur la base d'allégations non vérifiées qui ne sont pas nécessairement désintéressées ne doit donc pas être sous-estimé (voir, mutatis mutandis, Adamco c. Slovaquie, no 45084/14, § 59, 12 novembre 2019, et Fikret Karahan, précité, § 51). - EGMR - 48303/21 (anhängig)
FAJSTAVR v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- Was the applicant's conviction based solely or to a decisive degree on the statements of N.M., who was granted the status of a cooperating accused? Was this evidence corroborated by objective elements and were there appropriate procedural safeguards allowing a proper assessment of its reliability (see Habran and Dalem v. Belgium, nos. 43000/11 and 49380/11, § 105, 17 January 2017; Adamco v. Slovakia, no. 45084/14, § 71, 12 November 2019; and Erik Adamco v. Slovakia, no. 19990/20, § 76, 1 June 2023)?.