Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 14.02.2002 - 48470/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,34163) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.09.2001 - 48470/99
- EGMR, 14.02.2002 - 48470/99
Wird zitiert von ... (5)
- EGMR, 06.11.2006 - 44574/98
KOVACIC ET AUTRES c. SLOVENIE
However, relying on Eckle v. Germany (judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, §§ 69 et seq.), Jensen v. Denmark ((dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X) and Kljajic v. Croatia (no. 22681/02, § 23, 17 March 2005), they stressed that "an applicant's status as a victim may depend on compensation being awarded at domestic level on the basis of the facts about which he or she complains before the Court and on whether the domestic authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention". - EGMR, 12.06.2003 - 68693/01
PEDERSEN v. DENMARK
In this respect, the Court reiterates that an individual may be deprived of his status as a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention if the domestic courts acknowledge, at least in substance, a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and consequently meter out a more lenient sentence or exempt the defendant from defraying legal costs (see inter alia Graaskov Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X). - EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 64229/01
KOZAROV v.
The Court observes that the court settlement concluded between the applicant and the Fund did not acknowledge any failure to comply with the "reasonable time" requirement within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention or afford the applicant redress in an express and measurable manner (see Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X). - EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 42986/02
T. DALSGAARD AND J. DALSGAARD v. DENMARK
Thus, even assuming that the applicants" request for leave to appeal against the High Court's judgment related specifically to the length-of-the-proceedings-issue and that such a request may be considered an effective remedy (see, among others, Delanghe v. Belgium (dec.), no. 49716/99, 18 September 2001, and mutatis mutandis, Ohlen v. Denmark (striking out), no. 63214/00, 24 February 2005 and Graaskov Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X), the applicants have already made use of it. - EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 63214/00
OHLEN v. DENMARK
The Court recalls, as to the question whether the applicant may continue to claim to be a victim of a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the grounds of the length of criminal proceedings brought against him, that in order to deprive the individual concerned of his status as a victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, the national authorities must have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and provided redress in relation thereto e.g. by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see the Eckle v. Germany judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66, Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, 26 June 2001, § 27, Graaskov Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X and Normann v. Denmark (dec.), no. 44704/98, 14 June 2001, unpublished).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 20.09.2001 - 48470/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,35982) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JENSEN contre la DANEMARK
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
JENSEN v. DENMARK
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 20.09.2001 - 48470/99
- EGMR, 14.02.2002 - 48470/99
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 20.09.2001 - 48470/99
However this general rule is subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged in a sufficiently clear way the failure to observe the reasonable time requirement and have afforded redress by reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see the Eckle v. Germany judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, § 66 and Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, 26 June 2001, § 27).
- EGMR, 07.06.2012 - 38433/09
CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALY
The Court further reiterates that a decision or measure favourable to the applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him or her of "victim" status unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, §§ 69 et seq., Series A no. 51; Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; and Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X).