Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SERGEY BABUSHKIN v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Sergey Babushkin v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 28.11.2013 - 5993/08
• EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 5993/08

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2013 - 5993/08

  The effect of Article 13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.11.2013 - 5993/08

  The Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances or the victim's behaviour (see, among other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).

• EGMR, 07.03.2024 - 12166/19

  ZHDANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, §§ 31-58, 28 November 2013, concerning inadequate conditions of detention after conviction and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect; S.P. and Others v. Russia, nos.

  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Vorontsov and Others, cited above; Sergey Babushkin v. Russia (just satisfaction), no. 5993/08, 16 October 2014; and S.P. and Others, cited above, §§ 111-15), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 10727/07

  LAVEYKIN v. RUSSIA

  Since its first judgment concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Russian penitentiary facilities (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), the Court found similar violations in many cases against Russia which concerned the conditions of detention in remand prisons (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012) and correctional colonies (see Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, 28 November 2013, and Butko v. Russia, no. 32036/10, 12 November 2015).
• EGMR, 25.08.2015 - 46320/07

  KOKORIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Since its first judgment concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Russian penitentiary facilities and an excessive length of pre-trial detention (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), the Court has found similar violations in many cases against Russia which concerned inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in police wards (see Khristoforov v. Russia, no. 11336/06, 29 April 2010), remand prisons (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012) and correctional colonies (see Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, 28 November 2013), as well as conditions of transport (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-108, 22 May 2012).
• EGMR, 25.08.2015 - 10760/06

  ZAKIROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court notes at the outset that since its first judgment concerning the inhuman and degrading conditions of detention in Russian penitentiary facilities (see Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, ECHR 2002-VI), it found similar violations in many cases against Russia which concerned the conditions of detention in police wards (see Khristoforov v. Russia, no. 11336/06, 29 April 2010), remand prisons (see Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012) and correctional colonies (see Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, 28 November 2013).