Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LES SAINTS MONASTÈRES c. GRÈCE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. ... 14+6, Art. 14, Art. 14+9, Art. 14+11, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Exception préliminaire rejetée (ratione personae) Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Violation de P1-1 Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Non-violation de l'Art. 9 Non-violation de l'Art. 11 Non-violation de l'Art. 13 ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  THE HOLY MONASTERIES v. GREECE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. ... 14+6, Art. 14, Art. 14+9, Art. 14+11, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
  Preliminary objection rejected (ratione personae) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of P1-1 Violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 9 No violation of Art. 11 No violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14+6 No ...

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 05.06.1990 - 13092/87
• EKMR, 14.01.1993 - 13092/87
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87, 13984/88
• EGMR, 01.09.1997 - 13092/87

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87

  1 (art. 6-1) "embodies the 'right to a court', of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect" (Series A no. 18, p. 18, para. 36).
• EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

  LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87

  1 (art. 6-1)" (see the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 20, para. 44).
• EGMR, 23.06.1993 - 12875/87

  HOFFMANN c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87

  VI. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONVENTION TAKEN TOGETHER WITH ARTICLES 6, 9 AND 11 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 (art. 14+6, art. 14+9, art. 14+11, art. 14+P1-1) 91. The applicant monasteries relied lastly on Article 14 (art. 14) of the Convention, which provides: "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in [the] Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status." Before the Commission they claimed to be the victims of discrimination in that only the monasteries belonging to the Greek Church were affected by the provisions of Law no. 1700/1987.92. According to the Court's case-law, Article 14 (art. 14) does not prohibit all differences in treatment in the exercise of the rights and freedoms (see, as the most recent authority, the Hoffmann v. Austria judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no. 255-C, p. 58, para. 31).

 
• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87

  3. Proportionality of the interference 70. An interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions must strike a "fair balance" between the demands of the general interests of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights (see, among other authorities, the Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 26, para. 69).
• EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

  FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87

  By depriving them of any further possibility of bringing before the appropriate courts any complaint they might make against the Greek State, third parties or the Greek Church itself in relation to their rights of property, or even of intervening in such proceedings, section 1(1) impairs the very essence of their "right to a court" (see the Philis v. Greece judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209, p. 23, para. 65; and the Fayed v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp. 49-50, para. 65).
• EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87

  PHILIS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87

  By depriving them of any further possibility of bringing before the appropriate courts any complaint they might make against the Greek State, third parties or the Greek Church itself in relation to their rights of property, or even of intervening in such proceedings, section 1(1) impairs the very essence of their "right to a court" (see the Philis v. Greece judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209, p. 23, para. 65; and the Fayed v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp. 49-50, para. 65).
• EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87

  PADOVANI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87

  55. In cases arising from individual petitions made under Article 25 (art. 25) the Court's task is not to review the relevant legislation in the abstract; it must as far as possible examine the issues raised by the case before it (see, among many other authorities, the Padovani v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, para. 24).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87

  In this regard the Court points out that the only remedies which Article 26 (art. 26) of the Convention requires to be exhausted are those relating to the impugned violation and capable of redressing the applicants' complaints (see, among other authorities, the Airey v. Ireland judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, p. 11, para. 19).
• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13092/87

  Article 1 (P1-1) does not, however, guarantee a right to full compensation in all circumstances, since legitimate objectives of "public interest" may call for less than reimbursement of the full market value (see the Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, pp. 50-51, para. 121).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 29.11.2018 - C-235/17

  Kommission/ Ungarn (Usufruits sur terres agricoles)

  137 Vgl. insbesondere EGMR, 21. Februar 1986, James u. a./Vereinigtes Königreich (CE:ECHR:1986:0221JUD000879379, § 54), EGMR, 9. Dezember 1994, Les saints monastères/Griechenland (CE:ECHR:1994:1209JUD001309287, § 71), sowie EGMR, 23. November 2000, Ex-König von Griechenland u. a./Griechenland (CE:ECHR:2000:1123JUD002570194, § 89).