Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ERIK ADAMCO v. SLOVAKIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ADAMCO v. SLOVAKIA

  Art. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

  Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2023 - 19990/20

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 46, Series A no. 140; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2006-IX; and Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 83, 11 July 2017).
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 19867/12

  MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2023 - 19990/20

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 46, Series A no. 140; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2006-IX; and Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 83, 11 July 2017).
• EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84

  SCHENK c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2023 - 19990/20

  While Article 6 guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence as such, which is primarily a matter for regulation under national law (see Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, § 46, Series A no. 140; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 94-96, ECHR 2006-IX; and Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 83, 11 July 2017).

• EGMR - 48303/21 (anhängig)

  FAJSTAVR v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  - Was the applicant's conviction based solely or to a decisive degree on the statements of N.M., who was granted the status of a cooperating accused? Was this evidence corroborated by objective elements and were there appropriate procedural safeguards allowing a proper assessment of its reliability (see Habran and Dalem v. Belgium, nos. 43000/11 and 49380/11, § 105, 17 January 2017; Adamco v. Slovakia, no. 45084/14, § 71, 12 November 2019; and Erik Adamco v. Slovakia, no. 19990/20, § 76, 1 June 2023)?.