Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STRUC v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) No violation of Article 3 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 40131/09

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 40131/09

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 40131/09

  The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII).

 
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 40131/09

  A prompt response by the authorities in investigating allegations of ill-treatment may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001, and Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 136, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 40131/09

  The applicant's complaints in this regard were therefore "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 40131/09

  A prompt response by the authorities in investigating allegations of ill-treatment may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, among other authorities, Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001, and Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 136, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).

• EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18944/02

  CORSACOV AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 18 OTHER CASES

  40131/09.
• EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 26710/08

  TONCU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  À ce sujet, elle tient à rappeler que, en l'absence de preuve de souffrances individuelles ayant atteint l'intensité requise pour tomber sous le coup de l'article 3 de la Convention, le renvoi par le requérant à certains constats établis dans un rapport officiel (paragraphe 25 ci-dessus) ne fournit pas à lui seul une base suffisante pour conclure à la violation de l'article 3 de la Convention (Gorea c. Moldova, no 21984/05, § 50, 17 juillet 2007, et Struc c. République de Moldova, no 40131/09, § 66, 4 décembre 2012).