Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MAJEWSKI v. POLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 24.08.2004 - 52690/99
- EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99
Wird zitiert von ... (284) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII and Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, § 60, 15 October 1999). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 24549/03
MICHALAK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99
For a more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic legal provisions see Michalak v. Poland (dec.), no. 24549/03, §§ 12-23, to be published in ECHR 2005-... - also available on the Court's Internet site (http://www.echr@coe.int).
- EGMR, 08.04.2008 - 40387/06
KRAWCZAK v. POLAND
The Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Kusmierek v Poland, no. 10675/02, judgment of 21 September 2004; and Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, judgment of 13 July 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...).Furthermore, the Court considers that, in dismissing the applicant's complaint that the proceedings in his case had exceeded a reasonable time, the Court of Appeal failed to apply standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in the Court's case-law (see Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, § 36, 11 October 2005).
The Court has already indicated on a great number of occasions that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the particular circumstances of the case taken as a whole and in this connection the Court's approach consists in examining the overall length of the proceedings and in covering all stages of the proceedings (see Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, § 34-35, 11 October 2005).
- EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 72287/10
RUTKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Contrary to the Court's established case-law on the assessment of the reasonableness of the length of proceedings (see, among many other examples, Kudla, cited above, § 119-124; Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, §§ 58-60, 15 October 1999; Turczanik v. Poland, no. 38064/97, §§ 38-39, ECHR 2005-VI; Beller v. Poland, no. 51837/99, § 67-71, 1 February 2005; Koss v. Poland, no. 52495/99, §§ 28 and 33, 28 March 2006; and, in particular, Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, § 35, 11 October 2005), the courts did not examine the overall length of the proceedings but only selected parts of them. - EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 21695/05
TUR v. POLAND
The Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Kusmierek v Poland, no. 10675/02, judgment of 21 September 2004; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, judgment of 13 July 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...).The Court's approach consists in examining the overall length of proceedings and in covering all stages of the proceedings (see Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, § 34-35, 11 October 2005).
- EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 24203/05
KYZIOL v. POLAND
The Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, 21 September 2004, and Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, 13 July 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...).Furthermore, the Court considers that, in dismissing the applicant's complaint that the proceedings in his case exceeded a reasonable time, the Cracow Regional Court failed to apply standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in the Court's case-law (see Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, § 36, 11 October 2005).
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
As to the circumstances of the instant case, the Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, judgment of 21 September 2004; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, judgment of 13 July 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007). - EGMR, 26.06.2007 - 11602/02
SPÓLKA Z O.O. WAZA v. POLAND
As to the circumstances of the instant case, the Court notes that it has specified in a number of cases the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention as regards the guarantees of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Kusmierek v. Poland, no. 10675/02, judgment of 21 September 2004; Zynger v. Poland, no. 66096/01, judgment of 13 July 2004) and the requirement of an effective remedy capable of providing appropriate redress for the damage resulting from the breach of this right (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI; Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, ECHR 2005-... (extracts); Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-...; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, ECHR 2006-...; Wende and Kukowka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007). - EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 32588/06
GODYSZ v. POLAND
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-IX; and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.) no. 15212/03, HR 2005-...). - EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 55726/07
WYSOCKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007). - EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 48639/14
LEVKOVSKI AND TRPKOVSKA v.
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against the respondent State, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 6 § 1 about one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, §§ 38-41, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, §§ 63-65, 10 May 2007; Petkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.) no. 27314/04, 13 November 2008; and Ajvazi v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.) no. 30956/05, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 6861/05
PETROVA AND OTHERS v.
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against the respondent State, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of Article 6 § 1 about one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-....; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, §§ 38-41, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, §§ 63-65, 10 May 2007; Petkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.) no. 27314/04, 13 November 2008; Ajvazi v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.) no. 30956/05, 13 November 2008). - EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 27307/04
GORESKI AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 40127/04
MIHAJLOV RISTOV AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 16.10.2014 - 40160/04
STERJOV AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 6861/05
PETROVA AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 30523/07
ADAMCZUK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 6909/07
MUCHOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 30523/07
ADAMCZUK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 15418/10
YESILBAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.02.2020 - 59805/14
HERMANN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 21.05.2019 - 16573/10
KUS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 72785/10
GÜNER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 25.08.2015 - 24335/13
MATASOVIC AND PEICIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 22830/14
VUJCIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 43443/11
DUZEL v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 75660/12
ZUZUL v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 7068/11
POWALKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 18878/12
GUSKOVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 52635/12
SOPRUNOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 64596/12
ZAVADSKIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 19631/08
ZELENSKA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 44034/11
KACKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 56311/08
WILCZYNSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 46876/08
CAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10
RUTKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 41734/06
LANTOS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 6200/10
WILKIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 12.02.2013 - 10958/08
SOKOLOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 7362/09
WILCZYNSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 9848/10
GARBACZEWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 55532/09
KOC v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 16853/10
WOJCIK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 25827/08
ZORLU ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 36321/08
SOLOBODOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 31.01.2012 - 6715/08
GIRGIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 6497/08
NAJMOWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 22551/05
ERDONMEZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 51542/09
JAKUBISIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 17293/07
GÖÇMEN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 34144/08
SAN AND KURA v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 38360/09
CELEBIOGLU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 57758/08
KIZILTOPRAK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 31511/07
AVSAR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 39148/09
SADAY v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 7383/06
OZENBAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 42942/06
BAYDILLI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 14926/10
KARP v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 32563/09
DASCHKE v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.05.2011 - 53524/08
CZUBERNAT v. POLAND
- EGMR, 31.01.2011 - 38454/04
TODOROV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 10769/08
KIERZEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 8553/09
NIKOLAJUK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 30486/09
MICHALSKA-BUNDGARD v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.11.2010 - 36714/09
G.L. v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 46741/06
CSERVENYÁK v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 45747/08
OTTO v. POLAND
- EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 537/07
MACKO v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 20364/07
MARANGOS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 10405/09
KLIMEK (II) v. POLAND
- EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 49242/07
GORALSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.09.2010 - 45463/08
VASSILAS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 45657/08
SURMAN-JANUSZEWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 29512/08
TELEVANTOU v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 9095/08
FACONDIS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 29517/08
CONSTANTINOU v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 59571/08
KYPRIANOU v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 11.05.2010 - 5127/09
SADOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 10995/07
STOBIK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 25.03.2010 - 29373/08
MAKRIDES v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 11.03.2010 - 52814/08
PAPAKOKKINOU v. CYPRUS (II)
- EGMR, 11.03.2010 - 35686/08
PAPAKOKKINOU v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 25.02.2010 - 43249/08
CHARALAMBIDES v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 34371/07
PAPACHRISTOFOROU v. CYPRUS (N° III)
- EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 3888/06
CONSTANTINOU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS
- EGMR, 19.05.2009 - 38166/02
KEDZIOR v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.07.2008 - 6809/03
CZAJKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 72169/01
RZESZOWSKA-SOBCZYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28436/04
STULA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 73192/01
WAWRZYNOWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 21.04.2020 - 23925/13
NAPIERALA AND KUBICA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 373/10
SREDNICKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 63624/09
SZOPA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 19933/15
MILAKOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2018 - 2996/16
VIDOJEVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 21.02.2017 - 47753/15
FROLOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 60957/12
SUKOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 45638/13
GAJ RASOVIC DOO v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 62897/13
SALAJ AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 17302/12
GUGOLJ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 17180/13
INTERMEDICAL D.O.O. v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 46610/13
CAETANO DE BARROS v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 23928/13
RAMOS FETAL FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 51521/10
VRANJKOVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
- EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 40600/11
KENNAUGH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 6159/13
CASTANHEIRA BARROS v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 56876/13
HERNANDEZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.09.2015 - 59116/12
AUBERT MENDES DE MORAIS v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 25.08.2015 - 63588/13
ESTEVES RODRIGUES NOBRE SEQUEIRA AND PINTO CARRASQUEIRA SEQUEIRA v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 10894/11
KLARIC v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 09.06.2015 - 68049/13
MAKARUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 27767/13
SKUBONJA v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 37623/13
JUGOBANKA AD BELGRADE v.
- EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 44562/13
KAPLUN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 916/12
SERBA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 18055/07
BANDE v.
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 7394/13
TEKLIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 35589/11
PARDAL v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 66465/12
GOUVEIA v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 12970/10
STOJANOVSKA v.
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 35832/10
MOMIROVSKI v.
- EGMR, 04.11.2014 - 59225/12
DUBROVINA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 75483/13
SILAJ v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 25648/12
SHEVCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 28833/12
KAMEKS TRANS LTD v.
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 64736/11
PETKOVSKA v.
- EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 58256/09
JOVANOV AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 15503/12
BORISENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.08.2014 - 41710/06
GAVRYLOVA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.08.2014 - 654/07
GAYDAY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.08.2014 - 30884/06
PAUNOV v.
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 42350/04
TASKOV AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 47720/06
ILIEVSKI v.
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 32591/09
ISLAMSKA VERSKA ZAEDNICA AND PECOV v.
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 42053/11
GAMURARI AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.06.2014 - 6132/09
PROKOPENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 10305/07
GOLOVKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 18578/12
ANDRE ATANASIO v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 20.05.2014 - 75168/12
GORBULINSKAYA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 25682/07
GORGIEVA AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 42886/07
VELEVSKA AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 43566/08
HUMANITARIAN ORGANIZATION 'VOSKRESENIE' BITOLA v.
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 50070/11
KOCKOVSKA AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 5006/09
KOSTOVA AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 10001/09
PIPEREVSKA AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 4237/13
CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 41933/04
GZZ IZVEDBA OHRID v.
- EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 19405/07
ARSOV v.
- EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 5700/08
SEMENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 53338/07
KOZLOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 58882/11
KUCHUGURNA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 29.01.2014 - 29085/06
LYUBARETS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 7757/12
LITVINYUK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 552/07
YEMELYANOV AND YEMELYANOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 48768/09
VLADUSIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 60069/09
NAUMOVSKI AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 3517/08
JAKIMOVSKI AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 36895/12
SÝKOROVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 29860/07
JANEVSKI AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 17129/11
BURLA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 40077/06
CHEMEREGA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 17153/12
PIMENTEL DIAS SERRALHEIRO v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 22506/11
BOZINOVSKI v.
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 28174/05
NPK INTELEKT AND KRSTEVSKI v.
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 70925/11
INECIL-INDÚSTRIA E ENGENHARIA CIVIL,SA v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 40671/12
ION v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 2587/08
JOVANOVA AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 27293/07
IVANOVSKI AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 72092/11
VIEIRA PINHEIRO v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 32311/07
BOZJAK v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 35583/11
GRISHYNA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 32622/07
ONOPRIYENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 49350/07
MAKSYMCHUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 41973/10
TOTOI v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 7405/06
BACEV AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 71080/10
GASHI AND OTHERS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 64209/09
CAMOVSKI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 35098/06
MISHCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 39809/06
DEMCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 34674/07
YURIK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 2210/10
RYSIEW v. POLAND
- EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 2125/08
POTISHKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 25442/12
KOHOUTEK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 28990/06
POPOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 4815/09
OGLUDEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 41578/09
BILYY AND BILA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 53311/07
MIRCEVSKI AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 57974/10
HAMACHEROVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 29957/10
OBCANSKÉ SDRUZENÍ TWRA - THIRD WORLD RELIEF AGENCY AND RUBEK v. THE CZECH …
- EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 41305/11
SRNCOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 12961/10
RYBÁROVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 19220/10
LINARD v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 27875/08
KILIBARDA v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 35493/06
MIULESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 49932/10
SOFRONIA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 39921/03
MITRICA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 12967/06
MÉSZÁROS v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 19.03.2013 - 20988/05
NELCESKA AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 15657/06
TIMOFTE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 53138/08
BORBÉLY v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 61503/08
DUMITRESCU AND ENESCU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 11.09.2012 - 58485/11
BIADON v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 23253/08
LJAJIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 6022/08
BATURAN v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 26527/10
RATY v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 39202/09
LENGYEL v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 52677/09
BRZAKALA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 13454/09
RADOSZEWSKA-MLOSEK AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 29514/08
ZIVKOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 45378/06
LEKPEK v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 11862/05
ANTON v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 16.06.2011 - 19952/07
VISKUPOVA AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 9523/10
FABISIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 46811/06
JUHAS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 10.05.2011 - 6038/08
NESKOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 9285/07
MUDERIZOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 22.03.2011 - 26894/06
TUDOR v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 08.03.2011 - 8136/07
BODIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 5220/10
HARCZ v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 07.12.2010 - 43008/06
KATIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 20770/07
BACZOVSZKI v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 10481/06
LAUFIK v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 25313/07
GALLO v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 33529/08
KOUDELOVA AND DROBNA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 32037/02
ZARZAD WSPOLNOTY GRUNTOWEJ 'LOMZYCA' v. POLAND
- EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 18346/08
PEPLOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 18765/08
JACEK WASIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 41298/07
LUKASIK-KOWALSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.11.2009 - 5318/07
WIECKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 39839/06
KUPIEC v. POLAND (NO.2)
- EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 1232/08
SZYMCZYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 06.10.2009 - 52468/07
PORTUS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.09.2009 - 39150/06
DAAB v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.09.2009 - 24417/08
CHMIELEWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 01.09.2009 - 41536/08
BARTOSIEWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 29302/03
TOBOLTOC v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 7504/07
BODNARIU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 20397/05
ISTRATE v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 11261/07
NOWOSAD v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.06.2009 - 38168/07
KOZLOWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 35074/03
MATUSZCZYK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 36245/07
CIOBOTARU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 19.05.2009 - 4215/06
WILCZYNSKI v. POLAND (NO. 3)
- EGMR, 19.05.2009 - 49324/08
ARKADIUSZ KUBIK v. POLAND (NO. 2)
- EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 22645/05
DZIEDZIC v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 13425/04
BABES v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 45403/04
POPIEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 8651/04
GALUSIEWICZ v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.12.2008 - 38751/05
WILCZYNSKI v. POLAND (NO. 2)
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 38595/05
TOMULA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 12447/04
MAMZER AND DYLICH v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.09.2008 - 22515/06
ZAKRZEWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.09.2008 - 31835/03
TOBOREK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 14894/03
GWARDYAN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 18053/06
SIERZPUTOWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 10281/03
FIGIEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 01.07.2008 - 12526/02
LEWANDOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 6480/04
KWASNIK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 22.04.2008 - 18779/02
HRYNIEWICKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 22286/02
PRZEWOSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.01.2008 - 6420/02
MODLKOWSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.01.2008 - 37850/03
M. M. v. POLAND
- EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 45451/06
TRZNADEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.10.2007 - 19560/02
POPIEL v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 4560/04
KWIATKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 755/10
DOSTINOSKA v.
- EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 21345/06
DIMITROVI v. BULGARIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 37330/08
JANKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.11.2009 - 43018/07
TENDERA-WLASZCZUK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.09.2009 - 68978/01
BATOR v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 48713/07
VUKOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 25.08.2015 - 22256/14
DE JESUS AFONSO AND TEIXEIRA RODRIGUES DA CRUZ v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 48807/08
DARAVELSKI v.
- EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 2399/12
DIKIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 39000/13
KRAVCHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 01.04.2014 - 8077/13
CUNHA MARTINS DA SILVA COUTO v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 19.11.2013 - 5745/09
WILCZYNSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 35103/07
OMELCHUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 27.08.2013 - 690/12
URBAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 26.03.2013 - 10671/10
GORDON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 6382/06
PAUNOVIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 36307/06
VELCHEVA AND SOTIROVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 11.05.2010 - 49194/08
KALITA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.03.2010 - 1339/09
IWINSKA AND MAZUR v. POLAND
- EGMR, 27.07.2009 - 1083/07
PIELOK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.10.2008 - 14883/04
NOWINSKI v. POLAND