Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PRZYBYSZEWSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND

  Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• famrz.de (Kurzinformation)

  Rechtsrahmen für gleichgeschlechtliche Paare in Polen

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  PRZYBYSZEWSKA v. POLAND and 9 other applications

  Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• KAG Mainz, 20.02.2019 - M 9/19

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  On 30 April 2018 the ninth and tenth applicants also lodged a constitutional complaint with the Constitutional Court (case no. SK 9/19).

  On 15 December 2021 the Constitutional Court discontinued the proceedings in case no. SK 9/19.

  However, the proceedings concerning the complaints lodged by the last two applicants and registered under case no. SK 9/19 were discontinued on 15 December 2021 (see paragraph 12 above).

  In the decision to discontinue case no. SK 9/19, the Constitutional Court considered that the matter of the impossibility of same-sex partners marrying should be characterised as a legislative omission, the examination of which was outside the competence of the Constitutional Court.

• EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 20081/19

  BUHUCEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  To that end, it must examine whether, having regard to the margin of appreciation afforded to it, the respondent State struck a fair balance between the prevailing interests it relied on and the interests claimed by the applicants (see Fedotova and Others, cited above, § 191, and Buhuceanu and Others v. Romania, nos. 20081/19 and 20 others, § 75, 23 May 2023).

  I refer in this respect to the views I expressed in my dissenting opinion appended to the judgment in Fedotova v. Russia ([GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, 17 January 2023), which were further developed in my joint dissenting opinion with Judge Harutyunyan in Buhuceanu v. Romania (nos. 20081/19 and 20 others, 23 May 2023).

• EGMR, 24.06.2010 - 30141/04

  SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  It should be noted that in Schalk and Kopf v. Austria (no. 30141/04, ECHR 2010), the [Court] held that the Convention did not oblige a member State to legislate on or recognise marriages between persons of the same sex, but for the first time expressly accepted homosexual couples as a form of "family life'.

  Indeed, the Court has confirmed on several occasions that Article 8 of the Convention was applicable under both its "private life" and "family life" aspects in cases concerning the alleged lack of legal recognition and/or protection for same-sex couples (see Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, § 94, ECHR 2010; Oliari and Others v. Italy, nos.

 
• EGMR, 07.05.2021 - 4907/18

  XERO FLOR w POLSCE sp. z o. o. - Unabhängigkeit der polnischen Gerichte

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  z o.o. v. Poland (no. 4907/18, 7 May 2021).
• EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 40183/07

  Kein Recht auf die Ehe für alle

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  26431/12 and 3 others, § 143, 14 December 2017; Pajic v. Croatia, no. 68453/13, § 68, 23 February 2016; Chapin and Charpentier v. France, no. 40183/07, § 44, 9 June 2016; and Taddeucci and McCall v. Italy, no. 51362/09, § 58, 30 June 2016).
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9697/82

  JOHNSTON AND OTHERS v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  The Government emphasised that an evolutive interpretation of the Convention should not result in deriving from the Convention or its Protocols rights that had not been included therein at the outset (they referred to Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 57, Series A no. 112).
• EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 43572/18

  GRZEDA v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  Lastly, the Court has already established that the whole sequence of recent events in Poland vividly demonstrated that successive judicial reforms were aimed at weakening judicial independence, starting with the grave irregularities in the election of judges of the Constitutional Court in December 2015 (see Grzeda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, § 348, 15 March 2022).
• EGMR, 03.02.2022 - 1469/20

  ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  The Court thus agrees with the applicants that the effectiveness of their constitutional complaint also has to be seen in conjunction with the general context in which the Constitutional Court had operated since the end of 2015 (see Advance Pharma sp. z o.o v. Poland, no. 1469/20, § 319, 3 February 2022).
• AG Lüdinghausen, 18.06.2012 - 19 OWi 65/12

  Feststellung der Geschwindigkeitsüberschreitung eines Autofahrers durch ein …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  Tenancy (Article 691 of the Civil Code) 20. The Supreme Court's (Civil Chamber) resolution of 28 November 2012 (case no. III CZP 65/12) stated as follows:.
• RG, 31.03.1903 - 28/03

  Zur Bestimmung des Begriffs "Standesherr" in § 7 des zum …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

  28/03/2017.
• EGMR, 01.06.2023 - 75135/14

  MAYMULAKHIN AND MARKIV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 40/14

  AUSTIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM