Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 23383/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,270) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CUENCA ZARZOSO v. SPAIN
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home;Respect for private life) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
CUENCA ZARZOSO v. SPAIN
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 16.11.2004 - 4143/02
MORENO GÓMEZ c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 23383/12
On 16 November 2004 the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter "the Court") delivered a judgment in the case of Moreno Gómez v. Spain (no. 4143/02, ECHR 2004-X).After the Moreno Gomez judgment (Moreno Gómez v. Spain, no. 4143/02, ECHR 2004-X), the EU issued the Directive 2006/12, which in its Article 4 § 1(a) regulates pollution which causes "a nuisance through noise or odours".
- EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 50474/08
BOR v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 23383/12
The Court has repeatedly emphasised that the existence of a sanction system is not enough if it is not applied in a timely and effective manner (see Bor v. Hungary, no. 50474/08, § 27, 18 June 2013). - EGMR, 24.10.2013 - 72631/10
NECHEPORENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.01.2018 - 23383/12
After the Moreno Gomez judgment (Moreno Gómez v. Spain, no. 4143/02, ECHR 2004-X), the EU issued the Directive 2006/12, which in its Article 4 § 1(a) regulates pollution which causes "a nuisance through noise or odours".
- EGMR, 01.12.2020 - 17840/06
YEVGENIY DMITRIYEV v. RUSSIA
However, the Court considers that the State authorities took a formalistic approach to interpreting the operative part of that judgment (see paragraphs 16, 18 and 51 above), thereby causing significant delays in the enforcement proceedings, which only prolonged the applicant's suffering from the noise and other nuisances (see, for similar reasoning, Cuenca Zarzoso v. Spain, no. 23383/12, §§ 50-1, 16 January 2018, and Moreno Gómez v. Spain, no. 4143/02, § 61, ECHR 2004-X). - EGMR - 27658/22 (anhängig)
DJURINCAIA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Was the detriment suffered by the applicant on account of the noise sufficiently severe to raise an issue under Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Yevgeniy Dmitriyev v. Russia, no. 17840/06, §§ 31-33, 1 December 2020; Mileva and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43449/02 and 21475/04, §§ 89-97, 25 November 2010; Cuenca Zarzoso v. Spain, no. 23383/12, §§ 40-54, 16 January 2018)?.