Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 43696/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,3918) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KALUZNA v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 03.04.2001 - 27229/95
KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 43696/14
As to the substantive limb, it needs to be considered whether the State has complied with its positive obligations under Article 2 (see Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001-III and Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, 5 July 2005). - EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97
ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 43696/14
Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability of establishing the circumstances of the case or the person responsible is liable to fall foul of this standard (see, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 140, ECHR 2002-IV). - EGMR, 07.01.2003 - 57420/00
YOUNGER contre le ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 43696/14
The Court has had previous occasion to emphasise that persons in custody are in a vulnerable position and that the authorities are under a duty to protect them (see Keenan, cited above, § 91; Younger v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 57420/00 and Trubnikov, cited above, § 68). - EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 49790/99
TRUBNIKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 43696/14
As to the substantive limb, it needs to be considered whether the State has complied with its positive obligations under Article 2 (see Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001-III and Trubnikov v. Russia, no. 49790/99, 5 July 2005). - EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 30015/96
A.A. ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 43696/14
For a positive obligation to arise, it must be established that the authorities knew or ought to have known at the time, of the existence of a real and immediate risk to the life of an identified individual and, if so, that they failed to take measures within the scope of their powers which, judged reasonably, might have been expected to avoid that risk (see, amongst other authorities, Keenan, cited above, §§ 89-92, ECHR 2001-III, and A. and Others v. Turkey, no. 30015/96, §§ 44-45, 27 July 2004).