Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KAIPILA v. FINLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 8, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85

  H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 49453/99

  A waiver can be done explicitly or tacitly, in the latter case for example by refraining from submitting or maintaining a request for a hearing (see Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 20, § 66; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, pp. 19-20, § 58).
• EGMR, 12.05.1992 - 13770/88

  MEGYERI c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 49453/99

  The Court also reiterates that the requirements under Article 6 are generally stricter than those under Article 5 § 4 (see Megyeri v. Germany, judgment of 12 May 1992, Series A no. 237-A, p. 11, § 22).
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 49453/99

  A waiver can be done explicitly or tacitly, in the latter case for example by refraining from submitting or maintaining a request for a hearing (see Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 20, § 66; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, pp. 19-20, § 58).
• EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 11826/85

  HELMERS c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2005 - 49453/99

  However, the absence of a hearing before a second or third instance may be justified by the special features of the proceedings in issue, provided a hearing has been held at first instance (see Helmers v. Sweden, judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-A, p. 16, § 36).

• EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 5398/03

  U. R. gegen Deutschland

  Das Absehen von einer Verhandlung in einer zweiten oder dritten Instanz kann aufgrund der Besonderheiten des betreffenden Verfahrens gerechtfertigt sein (siehe u. v. a. Rechtssachen Ekbatani ./. Schweden , Urteil vom 26. Mai 1988, Serie A Bd. 134, Rn 31;… Jan Åke Andersson , a. a. O., Rn 29;… Helmers , a. a. O., Rn 36;… Fejde und Hoppe , beide a. a. O.; Ivanovski ./. ehemalige jugoslawische Republik Mazedonien (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 21261/02, 29. September 2005; und Kaipila ./. Finnland (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 49453/99, 18. Oktober 2005).
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 11320/05

  ISELSTEN v. SWEDEN

  The absence of a hearing before a second or third instance may be justified by the special features of the proceedings at issue (see, among many other authorities, Jan Åke Andersson, cited above, § 29; Helmers, cited above, § 36; Ivanovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.) no. 21261/02, 29 September 2005; and Kaipila v. Finland (dec.), no. 49453/99, 18 October 2005).
• EGMR, 04.02.2010 - 17169/06

  FELLER v. AUSTRIA

  Relying on the case of Kaipila v. Finland (Decision, no. 49453/99, 18 October 2005), the Government argued that also in the present case the decision to be taken by the authority had to rely to a large extent on the expert opinion of medical doctors and therefore was better determined in writing.